Washington/Seattle (Reuters)-The differences between US President Donald Trump and rival presidential candidate Joe Biden extend far beyond the planet.
President Trump’s plan to win the space race calls for a mission to the moon in 2024 and the termination of US direct financial support to the International Space Station in 2025-transferring control of this decades-old orbital laboratory to private individuals Space company.
People familiar with the matter said that, on the other hand, if Biden wins the White House, Biden may request the postponement of the moon landing plan and propose an extension of funding for the International Space Station.
Postponement of mission to the moon may cast more doubts about Boeing’s long-term fate
Just as Elon Musk’s SpaceX and Jeff Bezos’ Blue Origin compete for the next year’s rival rocket, the Space Launch System (SLS) rocket is also like this.
Extending support for the space station for another ten years will also give Boeing a huge boost. Boeing’s annual US$225 million International Space Station (ISS) operating contract is scheduled to expire in 2024, and it is in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic and The abyss of the financial crisis caused by the 737. MAX grounded after a fatal collision.
Boeing and SpaceX have already delivered spacecraft to astronauts under a plan jointly supported by Trump and Biden under the leadership of the Obama administration.
Although slowing down moon firing will delay the two companies’ winning contracts for lunar landers and related equipment, the emerging Biden space agenda appears to be largely aimed at promoting traditional defense contractors (such as Boeing) and “new Competition between “space” competitors (such as SpaceX), which promises to reduce costs and reusable rocket systems and space vehicles.
Mike French, vice chairman of the trade group of the Aerospace Industries Association, said that for the commercial aerospace industry, “consistency is the key”, and he previously served as NASA’s chief of staff under Obama.
“If you shake a sketch now, you will risk a series of potential historic achievements and the strong and sustained bipartisan support that NASA has in its entire product portfolio,” the Frenchman told Reuters.
About 20 former senior NASA officials and scientists under the Biden Sports Science Committee formed a volunteer group to informally help come up with ideas about space platforms.
Many have served in the Obama administration and are fighting for influential roles in the transition team or the Biden administration.
Reuters talked to three of them, as well as more than a dozen lobbyists, industry executives, and former officials of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, and they had their own discussions with Biden’s campaign.
The team members also hope to increase NASA funding for earth sciences and support partnerships with other countries. They emphasized that Biden’s space agenda and the distribution of personnel leading it are in the formative stage, because Biden’s campaign puts more pressing issues first, such as the coronavirus pandemic and unemployment.
Biden’s campaign spokesperson pointed out that Biden had spoken before. In August, after SpaceX launched on the ISS trip in the past ten years and returned the first astronauts from American soil to the United States, Biden said that he is looking forward to “leading a bold space program that will continue to send space Member heroes to expand our exploration and the frontier of science.”
Representatives for Blue Origin and Boeing declined to comment. SpaceX and the Trump campaign did not respond to requests for comment.
Beat Boeing Rockets
Several sources said, but Biden Space Group is divided on how to deal with Boeing SLS.
This super-heavy rocket was plagued by development delays and cost overruns, but it supports thousands of jobs in Alabama and California, and is regarded by its supporters as the core of NASA’s exploration program and a gateway to Trump The only way to the 2024 Artemis mission schedule.
Critics say that the rocket’s aging technology and launch costs of $1 billion or more per mission should prompt the White House or Congress to conduct a formal review of the plan, especially if SpaceX and Blue Origin can provide new rockets at a lower cost under.
The cost of flying Musk’s large and underpowered Falcon heavy aircraft is only $90 million, while the cost of each launch of the Delta IV Heavy, which is left by the United Launch Alliance, is about $350 million.
The two said that whether Biden’s space policy is a more business-friendly choice for SLS or “new space” players, it will be largely influenced by his choice of NASA administrators. Women serve.
Doug Loverro, the former head of human space flight at NASA, said that NASA sees SLS as the only human mission to the moon in the short term.
“But is this a long-term direction to continue to pursue?” Lovero asked.