قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / Health / These researchers tested positive. But the virus is not the cause.

These researchers tested positive. But the virus is not the cause.



However, some people at Roger Williams were angry and confused. A person working in the building said that the incident disturbed some faculty members in the Ocean Science Building. They said it disrupted the classroom, affected productivity and weakened emotional well-being. . The person said that others worry that teachers and students will see the event as an excuse to give up the test and gather at close range.

The president of the university, Brian Williams, admitted that these events have increased tensions. He said he could not provide more details because the university is still reviewing the matter.

Dr. Butler-Wu said that although laboratories specializing in diagnostics have long-term agreements to prevent such incidents from happening, “in epidemics and a large number of asymptomatic tests,” we have never encountered so many laboratories. Investigating the condition of pathogens”. Clinical Microbiologist. As a result, there are few contingency plans to deal with such abnormal test errors.

The person asked to remain anonymous to protect his position in the university. The person said that one of Roger Williams’s people was tested positive and he was “the person who was initially told that I would not be tested again”. This decision was quickly overturned, and the person tested negative, thus ending the “tension roller coaster”. The person familiar with the matter said that only a part of the 20 people who tested positive would have the opportunity to undergo a second test at the state health department, which raised ethical concerns.

Brown’s activities also caused “contradictions among faculty and staff,” said Edward Hawrot, senior associate dean of the university’s biology program. He said some people who tested positive and suspected the cause of contamination were “required to be retested” and were able to do so. However, many institutions do not have the resources to conduct free tests, so it is difficult to issue follow-up diagnostic information.

The guidelines issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention also advise against retesting people within 90 days of a positive result. There are no clear exceptions for potential contamination. In several institutions, many people whose tests may be contaminated, although their positive results are still susceptible to virus infection, because their positive results are considered legitimate, they stopped testing for weeks or months.

A teacher at Roger Williams tested positive in mid-October. This was one of 20 participants and he was able to resume routine screening. However, according to an email sent to several people in the building, when he recently tested positive again, health officials told him that he did not need to be isolated.


Source link