Former Special Counsel Robert Mueller testified before the Permanent Intelligence Select Committee of the House of Representatives on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC on Wednesday, July 24, 2019.
Melina Mara | The Washington Post | Getty Images
The Supreme Court said on Thursday that it will listen to the Trump administration’s appeal of a decision that will force the Justice Department to bring former Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s inquiry into Russian interference in the 201
The move was announced in the order in which no objections were raised, and it actually deprived House Democrats of the opportunity to review the documents before the election day. Four judges in the nine-member team voted to hear the case.
The case is likely to be heard during the court term beginning in October, and a ruling is expected at the end of June. President Donald Trump will run for the presumptive Democratic nominee Joe Biden again in November, which means that the case may be decided after Trump leaves office, or even dismissed because it is no longer relevant.
Usually secret documents are requested by the House Judiciary Committee led by the Democratic Party, which said it is investigating possible offenses.
The Chamber of Appeals for the Circuit Court of Appeals in Washington, DC, ordered the Justice Department to transfer the records in March. The Supreme Court temporarily suspended the decision of the Court of Appeal in late May to consider this issue.
The jury’s materials are usually tightly protected, but federal law permits disclosures related to “judicial proceedings”.
Democrats in the House of Representatives argued that the imp investigation is one such procedure. They have stated that although the Trump Senate innocenced the Ukrainian-related bomb charges in February, they are still considering whether to bomb President Each with new charges that might be related to Mueller materials.
The Ministry of Justice said that imp is not a judicial process. In court documents filed with the Supreme Court, Deputy Attorney General Noel Francisco argued that the Democratic Party’s position caused a major problem with the separation of powers. Francisco Francisco announced last month that he will leave the Justice Department starting Friday.
When urging the justices not to review the matter, Douglas Letter, a Democrat lawyer in the House of Representatives, wrote: “The Ministry of Justice has gone backwards.”
The letter wrote: “The only threat to the constitutional privileges of Congress comes from the newly created position of the Ministry of Justice, which will categorically refuse Congress to obtain the materials of the grand jury for ju judging, so that the core constitutional functions are treated more than conventional civil and Criminal proceedings are unfavorable.”
Judiciary Committee Chairman Rep. Jerry Nadler (DN.Y.) said in a statement issued on Thursday that Trump and Attorney General William Barr “will continue to pursue all responsibilities. Although I believe their legal arguments will fail, it is now more important for the American people to hold the president accountable in the ballot box in November. “
A spokesman for the Ministry of Justice did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The case is Ministry of Justice v. House Judiciary Committee No. 19-1328.