قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / Entertainment / The report raises questions about HFPA ethics

The report raises questions about HFPA ethics



The organization was recently sued for allegedly blocking qualified journalists who applied for qualifications. According to reports, the organization has been paying large amounts to members to serve as officials and committee members.

The week before the 78th Annual Golden Globe Awards ceremony, the organization behind the awards ceremony is emerging from the harsh exhibition. Los Angeles Times.

According to the 87 members of the Hollywood Foreign Press Association, there are zero black journalists. TimesThe ethics of its organization has long been questioned, and its history can be traced back to an FCC investigation that led to the 1

968-74 broadcast ban and the Pia Zadora scandal in 1982. The organization has continued to allow its members’ behavior to be questioned about their morality and integrity.

HFPA not only allows its members to receive generous treatment from the studios and networks that they later wrote and voted on for their projects, such as French intermediaries, which may help explain the recent Golden Globe nomination that suffered severe damage in Paris TV series Emily (Emily), and other head catchers. However, the organization is ostensibly a non-profit organization, and it is also paying salaries to its members (many of them struggling journalists) to cover the costs of serving as officials and committees.

Norwegian journalist Kjersti Flaa filed an antitrust lawsuit against HFPA last year, accusing the organization of banning her and other qualified journalists from becoming members in order to protect the value of current members’ reporting in different international territories, thereby depriving her of potential income. (All HFPA members must be located in Los Angeles and provide media coverage in a country or region outside the United States.) The lawsuit was dismissed, but its juicy details prompted many people to carefully study the secret HFPA.

This Times Talking with current HFPA members, they accused the group of arbitrarily rejecting “good-qualified foreign journalists” who applied for membership for people who were “not serious journalists.”A member who was granted anonymity told Times, “We accept people who are not real journalists because they will not threaten anyone.”

HFPA spokesperson told Times Flaa’s statement was “completely wrong” but said the organization was “committed to solving” its lack of diversity.This year’s Golden Globe nomination came under fire for omitting two films in the best film category, which were mainly black actors, such as Da 5 Bloods, Judah and the Black Messiah, the black background of Marlene with America and Billie Holiday, No nomination for an acclaimed TV series I might ruin you There are black casts in any category.

The multiple main names of Sia’s widely criticized and controversial movie also confuse many observers music And the above TV series Emily is in Paris. Although the former is still unexplainable, Times According to reports, Paramount Television brought more than 30 HFPA members to France in 2019 and visited the latter. There, they were seen as “staying two nights in a five-star hotel on the peninsula of Paris. The current room starts at about US$1,400 per night. The press conference and lunch are held at the Musee des Arts Forains. This is a full of entertainment. The private museum of sex dates back to 1850, when the show was filmed.” Times report.

An HFPA member told Times The HFPA representative told us that strong opposition to the nomination is necessary. Times “We do not control the individual votes of members…. We seek to build cultural understanding through film and television, and recognize how the power of creative storytelling can educate people around the world on issues of race, representation and orientation.”

This Times It is also reported that HFPA has been paying more and more money to its members from the growing pool of funds generated from its TV transactions with NBC. In the tax year ending June 30, 2019, five board offers were paid at prices ranging from $63,433 to $135,957. Other members who serve on the HFPA committee and write their website are charged. Last month, the twenty members of the Foreign Film Watching Committee each received US$3,465 in fees for watching foreign films. The monthly salary of travel committee members is US$2,310, the monthly salary of film festival committee members is US$1,100, and the monthly salary of archives committee members is US$2,200. Members who preside over the press conference will receive $1,200 per month.

This Times Talking with tax experts, they pointed out that this payment method is not common, especially for tax-exempt organizations. It also pointed out that the Television and Film Academy does not pay its members (although the Film Academy has 300 employees, while HFPA reportedly has only 6 employees).

An HFPA spokesperson told the media: “We are aware that our employees are facing unprecedented economic challenges due to the impact of the pandemic.” Times payment. “HFPA… will continue to compensate them for the range of services they provide to the organization.”

This Times Furthermore, HFPA members are one of the beneficiaries of a US$125,000 emergency relief fund jointly initiated by the organization and the Los Angeles Press Club. The existence of the foundation is one of the many charities supported by HFPA, but it has not been reported before, but the fact that HFPA members apply for relief themselves has not been reported.

Diana Ljungaeus, executive director of the Los Angeles Press Club, told Hollywood Reporter The board member committee judges applications only on the merits, and the vast majority of recipients are not HFPA members. (THR One of the authors of this story, Scott Feinberg (Scott Feinberg) is a board member of the Los Angeles Press Club. )

A source close to HFPA told Hollywood Reporter The organization “does not set conditions for those who grant grants to LAPC, but donates money to journalists in need according to LAPC’s charitable mission. Like all donors to reputable charitable organizations, we hope that LAPC will use these Funds promote their commendable charity activities.”




Source link