قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / World / The “genocide” movement promoted a new international crime: environmental destruction

The “genocide” movement promoted a new international crime: environmental destruction



If a country agrees to submit a proposal for extermination to the International Criminal Court for consideration, that will be the time to start even harder work. Approval is a multi-step process that requires the support of two-thirds or eight-eighths of court members, depending on the type of amendment introduced. (Vanuatu still supports the movement, but the spokesperson of the Vanuatu Embassy in Brussels, Dre Solomon, said that Covid-19 and the country’s “limited international diplomatic resources” have put aside ecological extinction propaganda.)

Although no country has pledged to formally propose the crime of ecological extermination, the campaign has gained increasing attention thanks to the youth-led climate movement and radical new groups such as the Extinction Rebellion.

In December last year, Sophie Wilmès, the Belgian Minister of Foreign Affairs, asked the member states of the International Criminal Court to study the possibility of criminalizing biocides. Members of the Belgian Parliament also introduced a bill criminalizing fungicides. French legislators are enacting laws to make the killing of eco-criminals a crime punishable by fines and imprisonment, even though those who stop the eco-extinction have criticized the bill as “weak”.

At least 1

0 countries have enacted national fungicide laws, including Vietnam, which enacted the law in 1990.

In addition, French lawyers filed a request on behalf of Amazon’s indigenous groups in January, asking the International Criminal Court to investigate Bolsonaro in Brazil for crimes against humanity.

The appeal alleges that deforestation encouraged by the Bolsonaro government and other policies forced indigenous people to leave their homes and even led to murders in the area.

Although the request relied on the criminal citations that the court had resolved, the lawyer who submitted the request stated that the case was also an example of the crime of killing ecology.

The Brazilian Embassy in Washington said in a statement: “The Bolsonaro government is taking concrete actions to improve the lives of indigenous people and ensure the future of the Amazon.”

The embassy said that more than 70% of eligible indigenous people have received the initial Covid-19 vaccination, and compared with the same period last year, the deforestation rate in the Amazon region has decreased by 21% from August to January.

Badenock said that although the obstacles to adopting new international crimes are large, they are not insurmountable.

He said: “These things take a long time and are very complicated.” “But they can do it.”

Into the mainstream

Although a campaign for killing laws may take years (if it fails at all), advocates say that this effort may bear fruit sooner: the campaign for killing ecology has brought the concept to public discussion.

Mehta did not expect the campaign to cause a sensation in the United States, but after four years in office as President Donald Trump, Biden’s special climate envoy John Kerry (John Kerry) She was encouraged by her arrival. She said: “We don’t want the United States to join the International Criminal Court soon, but that is to say, the dialogue surrounding ecological extinction itself, we don’t see any reason why it could not start happening in the United States.”

The State Department issued a statement stating that the United States “interacts regularly with other countries” to “prevent the importance of environmental damage during armed conflict,” but added that “we do not comment on the details of communication with foreign governments.”


Source link