Republicans and American companies are out.
In the past week alone, the American aviation and computer company Dell has strongly opposed GOP-led bills that restrict voting in its Texas home country. South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem (Kristi Noem) is a rising star in the Republican Party. She continues to be hotly debated for introducing a bill to ban transgender athletes in sports on the grounds that it may have an impact on the state’s bottom line. Conservatives spent a few days criticizing some companies for “vaccine passports” that need to be restored to normal.
Then came Georgia. After the airline’s chief executive and the chief executive of Atlanta’s other major business, Coca-Cola, were condemned, the Republican-controlled state House of Representatives voted to end Delta’s enjoyment of jet fuel with a small vote. Millions of tax deductions. New voting restrictions in the state. (The state Senate, led by the Republican Party, did not take this measure.) Last Friday, the Major League Baseball withdrew this year̵
The Republicans were angered.
Former President Donald Trump said in a statement: “Boycott baseball and all wake-up companies that interfere with free and fair elections.” “Are you listening to Coca-Cola, Delta, etc.?”
“Why are we still listening to these fake company forgeries about taxes, regulations and antitrust?” R-Fla. Senator Marco Rubio tweeted.
Although this disagreement (probably one of the most serious consequences in American politics and society) is taking shape, this kind of public dusting between companies and GOP members is becoming more frequent. This transformation is the product of the Republican Party’s increasing “culture war” issues that have brought vitality to Trump and the vibrant base of corporate powers that are under greater pressure than ever before. Ask them to ally with left-leaning voting rights, LGBTQ rights and anti-racism. Hard work.
As a result, the relationship between the Republicans has been in a state of competition. For many years, the Republicans have been advocating various liberal economic policies. These policies have widely benefited these companies, and these companies are using their power to promote race and harmony. The cause of social justice.
R-Pa Senator Pat Toomey retired and said: “We have been considering the main institutional drivers of this cultural war for a long time, because academia, art, media, and business have put this situation aside more until recently. .” told NBC News in an interview. He added that although he does not consider US companies to be the “largest participants to date”, those on the sidelines “can change the dynamics.”
There was a flash point this year. The conservative attitude towards Mr. Potato Head and Dr. Seuss’s “cancellation” for several weeks deserves anger. This has nothing to do with the government’s policy, but the toy manufacturer Hasbro and the famous children’s author’s own company targeting tolerance and race respectively. Decisions made by ism. The February Conservative Political Action Conference (which has long been a bastion of economic liberalism) set up a group to condemn the “awakening of American companies.”
David Mackintosh, chairman of the Growth Club, said: “Part of it is about 10 to 15 years of development.” “Reagan’s old alliance-including the Chamber of Commerce representing large and small businesses-was really hit by the Tea Party movement. “
This trend has intensified as the Republican Party has absorbed more white working-class voters and the Democratic Party has gained new success among wealthy suburban residents.
A Republican lobbyist said that under Trump, these shifts were “intensified” and the party was “going more towards this kind of culture war thing, making our voters more excited and making them truly excited” .
This person said: “Talking about corporate tax cuts and reducing cumbersome regulations will not work for our new voters.” “I don’t think that is so exciting. For those country club Republicans we lost. , It may be exciting, but we are losing them.”
However, although some Republicans accept some leftist policies, such as raising the minimum wage, the meaning of the policy is unclear. During the Trump administration, Republicans implemented tax cuts, and most of their proceeds went to companies that conservatives now condemn for social activism. Few Republicans abandon the traditional agenda of lowering taxes and deregulation, despite Senator Josh Hawley, R-Mo. Some famous Republicans, such as Rubio, tried to position themselves as opponents of the company.
Tommy said that he has seen “the rise of economic populism among some Republicans” and that if the company decides to “be part of a left-wing social movement,” more “anti-corporate momentum” is likely to emerge.
Republicans in Pennsylvania said this could lead Republican legislators to propose restrictions on stock buybacks, raise dividend tax rates, or even increase efforts to split large companies. One of the biggest protests of right-wing organizations is to oppose the cancellation of the platformization of prominent conservatives by American technology giants, although conservative content continues to dominate on platforms such as Facebook.
Tumei, the former chairman of the Growth Club, did not take such action.
“I will still fight for the right economic policy, right? I won’t say,’Well, let’s punish their bad behavior,’ because unfortunately, punishment is imposed on the American people and our economy.” He said. “So I won’t be a part of it.”
But Toomey and a staunch liberal like Ohio Senator Rob Portman. Roy Blunt, R-Mo. And Richard Burr of RN.C. will withdraw at the end of this term. If their successor is a Republican, they may be more aware of Trump’s political stigma.
A major test will be how Republicans respond to President Joe Biden’s tax increase plan. Among the proposals made by the White House is to increase the corporate tax rate from 21% to 28%, which is lower than the 35% tax rate inherited by Trump.
Indiana Rep. Jim Banks (Jim Banks) said that although Republicans are unlikely to vote for tax increases, they may not make a fuss about raising corporate tax rates.
He said: “I can tell you that I will fight like hell to ensure that the current government will not cancel the tax cuts we have passed for personal tax rates and working families.” “This is the focus of my attention.”
One of the biggest differences in this year’s relationship was after the deadly Capitol riot on January 6. Many companies announced that they will no longer donate to those who oppose Biden’s winning certificate in certain states. . Some people say that they will completely stop political donations through the company’s political action committee.
So far, this has not proven to be negative for Republicans. For example, Hawley saw his fundraising skyrocket in the first quarter of this year because he found himself on the “no-flying list” of certain company PACs.
Banks, who opposed the election college count, said that local news reports said he was cut off from corporate donations, which has been one of the “best” awards he has received in his hometown.
He said: “I can’t afford a better story.”
Some people think this is inevitable and the company will withdraw these promises. Republican lobbyists say that this is definitely the case for him “100%”.
This person said: “There are 435 members of Congress.” “To write off 147 of them, this is a difficult way to win the problem.”
Progressive reporter Judd Legum followed the habit of company donations after following the promise. He said he was not sure.
He said: “The world is changing.” “Consumers who are more conscious, consumers are also more aware of their own consumption patterns.”
Paul Washington of the Environmental, Social and Governance Center of the Management Conference Committee conducted research on behalf of its business members. He said: “The expectations of the present are different from the past, and the expectations of the company are different from the past.” They cannot see the politics they will soon face. And the reversal of social trends.
Ultimately, Mackintosh believes that American companies will have to “seriously study their own interests.”
“Are they better off with a party that might talk about their social agenda?” he said. “Or will they choose a political party that focuses on their economic interests to improve their lives?”