قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / Entertainment / The cheetah CGI in “Wonderful Woman 1984” is very bad

The cheetah CGI in “Wonderful Woman 1984” is very bad



Superhero movies actually only need two things to successfully attract an audience: humanity, relevant characters, and doubts about accepting those characters flying, wielding magical lassos, and using their power in a “real life” environment. . Bad performance and writing may derail the former, and bad special effects may kill the second.

The 1984 “Wonder Woman” is absolutely correct. In fact, the most important part of this movie is its role: Diana (Diana) strives to choose the right things rather than easy things; her relationship with Steve Trevor (Chris Pine); Barbara The loneliness, jealousy and frustration of Barbara Minerva (Kristen Wiig) are constantly being ignored; and the despair of Maxwell Lord (Pedro Pascal Pascal) It is considered important and successful at all costs.

As for the other parts? Well, “Wonder Woman in 1

984” contains about two hours of truly spectacular sight. The opening sequence is equal to some crazier heights of “Aquaman”. The whole film is full of bright, eye-catching visual effects, whether it is a still image or a moving image, its appearance is the same. The choreography is tightly arranged by the ballerina. Then, when the count is highest, it drops the GCI ball like a pixelated weight.


Please also read: Explanation of the crazy climax of “The Wonder Woman 1984”


Especially Cheetah, this is Barbara’s alien and one of the oldest comic book enemies of “Wonder Woman.” It looks like hot garbage.

The appearance of the cheetah is very late in the movie-which in itself is disappointing. Yes, Barbara got some cool action rhythms before that, such as fighting in the White House, or when she really got the company into drunken sexual harassment. But in those scenes, she still looks like a human being. Only in the final battle did she completely transform from the comics into the super villain of the cat.

Now, it is clear that Wiig did some excellent work before that.She allowed Barbara to subtly blend in the camp color, which allowed us to empathize immediately and sympathy Stay with her.


Please also read: Explanation of the winning scene in “Wonder Woman 1984” in 1984: Who is Asteria?


This brought her a pitiful surprise instead of frustrating Barbara when she finally turned herself into a villain in the second half of the movie. What a pity, many of the effects of that turn were subsequently damaged by her appearance after being completely transformed.

Boy, well, we mean bad. You can see your own photo in the photo above, but this is indeed the best thing to experience in context. The clue is, of course, that the battle took place outside the night, under the moonlight sky-even the scenes before and after the high tide took place in broad daylight. Of course, darkness is a well-known technique for concealing poor SFX.

But the dimmer cannot conceal the absence of Wiig’s weirdness in the scene, which is lower than the semi-floating quality of the CGI logo. It cannot hide the weird, muddy, spray paint quality of CGI hair that looks more like a glaucoma test to the audience than an effect.


Please also read: “The Wonderful Woman in 1984”: Everything about Dream Stone


To our particular shock, in the close-up shot, the cheetah entered a magical valley. It is only slightly better than some products in the 2019 “cat”. Thankfully, we think this is a short-lived scene, so we don’t have to spend much time focusing on it. Even so, we still hate to throw us out of the movie at the moment we spend waiting for the movie.

We know that this problem certainly plagues many recent movies based on DC Comics. Who can forget the end of the world in “Batman v. Superman: Dawn of Justice”. Or the pain and suffering caused by the seductive witch in “Suicide Squad.” When it comes to special effects, even the first “Supergirl” encountered some major obstacles-especially, the funny and ridiculous CGI battle with Ares at the end.


Please also read: Should the president in “The Spectacle of 1984” become Reagan?


However, Patty Jenkins (Patty Jenkins) has much more control over the movie than it does with Wonder Woman. She even had to make a soft ending that she didn’t allow last time. Alas, it seems that special effects are still needed to complete.

We think Dreamstone does provide us with the…price we want.


Source link