قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / Technology / The $200 Puro Pro hybrid in-ear headphones are almost perfect

The $200 Puro Pro hybrid in-ear headphones are almost perfect



Last December, a representative of Puro Sound Labs provided me with a review sample of the company’s flagship Bluetooth hybrid headset. Her timing couldn’t be better-I plan to have surgery on January 8th, which will make me lie on the sofa all day for two weeks, with nothing but movies and TV (ideally, no Drive my wife and children) crazy).

Puro Pro is an ear-hook design and can be connected to an audio source via Bluetooth 5.0 pairing or a simple headphone cable. It provides all the features of a pair of headphones you might dream of: safe volume limit (configurable to 85dBA or 95dBA), more than 30 hours of battery life, content control via the button on the left jar, active noise reduction , There is even a built-in microphone for making calls.

The price of Puro Pro is $200, which is more than what I usually spend on a pair of headphones for watching late night TV shows and flying on occasional airplanes (my two main use cases). However, after spending a few hours a day on Puro Pro for a few months, my heart beats faster.

How do i test

Puro Sound Labs PuroPro Hybrid Active Noise Cancelling Headphone product image

Puro Sound Labs PuroPro Hybrid Active Noise Cancelling Headphones

(Ars Technica may receive sales compensation through the link on this post through the affiliate program.)

Most of my time on Puro Pro is on the couch, watching content from YouTube Music, Amazon, Hulu, and Netflix, and some locally stored TVs and movies. My Roku Premiere + 4K UHD media player (for streaming content) and customized HTPC (for local content) are both connected to the Denon AVR-S510BT receiver and connected to the Boltune low-latency Bluetooth 5.0 from Denon’s headphone jack transceiver.

This setting is my most important headphone test scenario, but by connecting them (wired) to the Scarlett Solo preamplifier I use in the podcast studio, I also ran more demanding music accuracy tests on them. Scarlett Solo is connected to my workstation. Its main “working” function is to provide XLR input for the RE230 microphone, but it uses its 1/4-inch headphone jack (usually connected to the Sennheiser HD 280 Pro studio headphone pair) as the system’s main audio output interface, which has dual functions .

I should be very clear that my test is subjective—I actually used headphones and compared them with several sets of reference gears and shared my impressions here. Having said that, I am a very demanding listener. I grew up from my father’s broadcast engineer, and for the past 30 years, I’ve been trying to buy across the line between “this is the best thing you can buy” and “this is the enthusiast who makes the wallet drain” Nonsense of personal audio equipment. “

competition

I am a night owl, but my wife is an early riser, so quiet late-night movie and TV watching is very important to the Salter family. It turns out that wireless earbuds are not working for me. I tried several sound models that I like, but although they were found to be comfortable at first, long-term use can cause repeated ear infections. The battery life is not satisfactory-the LG Tone HBS-510 earbuds I use most often have only about 8 to 10 hours of play time, which is similar to many lesser-known brands.

Next, I tried a set of Monodal in-ear Bluetooth headsets for $35, which is an incredible value, and I finally bought a second pair for my wife (and fell in love with them). But I still have some comforting questions. After several episodes of TV shows are played in succession, the in-ear design will seem a bit clumsy. The battery life is about eight hours, which is not bad for the price, but not enough for you to travel across continents without careful management.

In the end, I used the $200 JBL Live 650BTNC in-ear Bluetooth headset. Compared with the Monodeal pairing, their over-ear design is more comfortable for long-term use, and the playback time of more than 20 hours has been greatly improved. The audio quality is also better than Monodeal. However, due to the weight, balance issues, and the long-term effects of very firm padding and huge clamping force on my head, they still cannot be 100% comfortable.

Although JBL headphones are not perfect, they are practical enough, so I am not really a substitute in the market.

Evaluate Puro Pro

For my main use case (watching TV and movies on the sofa late at night without disturbing my wife), Puro Pro headphones are undoubtedly the best option I have tried. I also found them very suitable for listening to a variety of music genres, including classical, acoustic, a cappella and hip-hop music.

Aside from the fact that the charging port is not USB-C, the only flaw I can find is that when the headset volume reaches maximum, it produces annoying background buzzing and produces intermittent sounds (for example, moving the focus to generate from a project To the Roku interface of another project). This defect can be easily resolved: the volume of the headset can be reduced with a single click instead of buzzing.

Comfortable

The inner cushion is very soft and comfortable, and the earphones provide enough clamping pressure to stay firm and will not harden after a few hours.

Although the weights of JBL and Puro headphones are similar, the balance is different.I don’t notice this immediately when I put on any set of headphones, but during an hour-long episode (or one) Lord of the Rings Movie), the JBL phone makes my neck a little tight, but the Puro Pro phone does not.

Compared to what I got from JBL headphones (or from my Sennheiser HD 280 Pro studio), Puro Pro headphones have lighter clamping pressure and softer padding after a few hours of prolonged use, which also brings me Significantly less “wet ears” sensation. The phone after recording the podcast.


Source link