قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / Science / Swaths of the jungle near the Great Barrier Reef have been leveled

Swaths of the jungle near the Great Barrier Reef have been leveled



A rejection of Kingvale's proposal would put Mr. Frydenberg in conflict with the Queensland Coalition MPs who vociferously supported the plan.

Scott Harris, owner of Kingvale Station, wants to clear the land – mainly eucalyptus forests and Melaleuca wetlands – for agriculture and other activities

The former Queensland-Newman government approved the works in April 2014. However, the federal government decided that clearing must also be judged according to Commonwealth laws.

  The government's own experts warned the land clearing proposal might damage the Great Barrier Reef.

The government's own experts warned that the land removal proposal could damage the Great Barrier Reef.

The department's draft report, which was closed this week, closed the proposal subject to certain conditions. A final recommendation will be given when examining submissions.

The conditions include that the clearing is limited to 1846 hectares and takes place only on shallow land to cope with the risks of erosion and sedimentation watercourse or wetland, contour banks must be used to manage the water flow, and erosion should prevail be repaired every rainy season.

The advocate told the department that land clearing would not damage the reef.

The clearing is proposed land that flows into two rivers that flow 200 kilometers downstream into the Great Barrier Reef.

The draft recommendation comes despite a government mandated warning that soil erosion through the works would "likely contribute to poor water quality" in the reef's World Heritage site.

  Forest at Kingvale Station, where more than 1800 hectares are to be cleared, photo courtesy of the Australian Conservation Foundation.

Forest in Kingvale Station, where more than 1800 hectares are to be cleared. Photo courtesy of the Australian Conservation Foundation.

The Marine Park Authority of the Great Barrier Reef also said floods are "almost guaranteed", resulting in fine sediment entering Princess Charlotte Bay, where the rivers hit the reef.

Poor water quality Quality is one of the most urgent problems of the reef. It is mainly caused by nutrient, pesticide and sediment deposits from agriculture. It can lead to algae growth at the expense of coral, block light and choke corals, as well as intensify outbreaks of poisonous crowns of thorns, which are a major cause of coral loss.

The Department also concluded that deforestation would affect a variety of endangered species including the Northern Quill and Loggerhead Turtles and Leatherback Turtles.

  The department said endangered loggerhead turtles could be affected by the proposal.

The department said endangered loggerhead turtles could be affected by the proposal

Photo: Brian Skerry / National Geographic

Despite the concerns raised, the department concluded that the probable effects of grubbing "will not be unacceptable" if the conditions are met.

The Department said In Queensland, the claimant was charged with illegal clearance in another of his homes, Strathmore Station. However, since the indictment was not heard by a court, the department has "no evidence that the advocate has produced an unsatisfactory environmental management record."

The department was under political pressure to justify the proposal. 19659023] In August 2016, Barnaby Joyce, then Minister of Agriculture, said that there was insufficient evidence that grubbing would affect the water quality in the reef.

  Minister of the Environment Josh Frydenberg will finally decide on the proposal.

Josh Frydenberg will make a final decision on the proposal.

That same month, Northern Australia's Minister Matt Canavan told the Australian newspaper that landowners should not face two levels of environmental assessment, adding that federal agencies Review of the Kingvale plan failed in its development.

Cairns MP Warren Dezsch told the newspaper that he had contacted Mr. Frydenberg to "ask what the bloody hell is going to [on] … in these areas you can not get development without land clearing." [19659029TheAustralianConservationFoundationanalystJamesTrezisesaiditwas"amazing"thatthegovernmentpouredmoneyintothewatertomakequalityimprovementsintheplanningto"stewmoredestruction"

He said that the proposal also approved the proposal create a dangerous precedent, as the clearing of trees on flat land does not pose a drain risk

Wilderness Society Queensland Campaign Manager Gemma Plesman said the proposed clearing "was incredibly risky."

"In the last four years, Queensland has cleared one million acres of indigenous vegetation because the former Newman government removed important environmental protection measures … this bulldozing plan … must be rejected," she said.

A spokesman for Mr Frydenberg said that the draft report of the department proposed "stringent conditions and mitigation measures based on scientific advice".

All feedback will be taken into account by the department as it completes its recommendation, he said.

Morning & Afternoon Newsletter

Delivered Mon-Fri.


Source link