The UN Security Council passed a resolution on Saturday, allowing only one of the two border crossings to deliver aid from Syria to Syria.
“The veto is not good for us,” Mustafa Alkaser told NBC News from a refugee camp in Idlib province in northwest Syria.
He said in a telephone interview on Sunday: “This is related to refugees, anti-free Syrians who once opposed Bashar Assad and demanded their freedom and dignity.” Syrian President Assad has been in power for 20 years Now-the last nine games were in a bloody civil war.
Aid agencies and doctors have also criticized this decision, which will lead to the closure of the Bab al-Salam border crossing in northern Syria to provide assistance. Now, food, medicine and other life-saving assistance will be delivered only through the Babhava border crossing.
The decision was made a few days after the first coronavirus case was confirmed in the area on Thursday, which raised concerns about the ruins of the hospital and the overcrowding of the camp after the war of nearly ten years.
Dr Zaher Sahloul, who works extensively in northern Syria, said via email: “This will limit the flow of life-saving medical services including PPE, oxygen, drugs and ventilators to fragile communities that cannot even afford the extravagant social distance .”
He also criticized the confrontation between Russia and China with 13 other UN Security Council members after a week of high-risk confrontation, which was “severe and ruthless political manipulation” around the border crossing.
An overwhelming majority voted twice to maintain two border crossings from Turkey, but Russia and China rejected both resolutions. Since the outbreak of the conflict in 2011, these veto powers have been Russia’s 15th and 16th in the Syrian resolution, while China has ranked 9th and 10th.
But earlier on Saturday, the Security Council voted to approve a 12-0 crossing from Turkey, with Russia, China and the Dominican Republic abstaining. Russia, which supports Assad, argued that assistance should be provided across the conflict line from within the country, saying that only one border crossing is needed.
After the vote, Dmitry Polyanskiy, Russia’s first permanent deputy to the United Nations, tweeted that Russia “consistently advocates the delivery of humanitarian products to Syria, while fully respecting the country’s sovereignty And territorial integrity, and must have the coordination of its rule of law government.”
He added: “This issue must not be politicized.”
China responded to his comments in the statement. The statement said that China believes that “the international community should increase humanitarian assistance to the Syrian people on the basis of respecting Syria’s sovereignty and territorial integrity.” It also called on the United States to relax sanctions on the Syrian regime to improve the humanitarian situation in the country.
But aid agencies also criticized the border crossing closure.
Aid agencies operating in Syria said in a joint statement: “Life will be lost. Suffering will worsen.”
They said that it is estimated that 1.3 million people will find it difficult to rely on food and medicine delivered across the border by the United Nations.
The statement said: “Many people will not be able to get the help they need now.” “The first case of COVID-19 was confirmed in Idlib. Idlib is a region that seriously weakens the medical infrastructure. This is a Catastrophic blow.”
Oxfam, International Rescue Committee, Doctors Without Borders and Human Rights Watch also issued separate statements condemning this decision.
Belgium and Germany endeavoured to maintain the passage of the second crossing, saying it was a “sad day” for the Security Council and the Syrian people.
They said in a joint statement that there are 1.3 million people in the Aleppo area, including 800,000 displaced Syrians, including 500,000 children, who received humanitarian assistance through the Bab Salam crossing point, and now These aids were cut off.
They added: “One crossing point is not enough, but no crossing point will leave the fate of the entire problem area.”
U.S. Ambassador Kelly Craft tweeted that the resolution “is not the goal that the United States and other countries are striving for, and it is far from meeting the needs of the Syrian people.” Kraft (Craft) in another The statement added that the voting results made her “sick and angry”.
Back in Syria, Abdulkafi Alhmado, who lives in the countryside near the northern front of the country, accused Russia of using “hungry weapons” to try to win Assad.
He said that the current aid to enter the country is far from enough.
At the same time, Alkaser, 38, said that Russia and China’s position shows that foreign powers are unable to help millions of people who have been displaced by military conflicts since 2011.
“Almost ten years later, no one wants to stand with us and help us.”
Amak Cheikh Omar reports from Antakya. Yuliya Talmazan and Adela Suliman from London.
Reuters and the Associated Press contributed to this report.