قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / Entertainment / Prince Harry, Meghan Markle and Royal Romance

Prince Harry, Meghan Markle and Royal Romance



The thing about royal weddings is that there are not many. Virtually anyone who marries into Windsor's home represents a first in one sense or another. Philip Mountbatten was the first Greek prince (and the third cousin of the bride). Diana Spencer was the first to drop the word "obey" from her vows. Sarah Ferguson was a redhead. Sophie Rhys-Jones was a commoner with a serious career. Kate Middleton was a commoner without one. Camilla Parker Bowles, now a grandmother, was unprecedented in describing herself in a love letter as "your devoted old bag." It's not surprising that Prince Harry marries Meghan Markle ̵

1; a divorced biracial American actress, as she is forever mentioned in articles and books, mostly written by married white British journalists.

Reading these reviews makes it clear that Markle stands out in many other ways. She could also be described as the "daughter of a lighting director who allegedly won seven hundred and fifty thousand dollars in the lottery and later went bankrupt" or "among the youngest members of the National Organization for Women, to which she joined after she had seen an sexist promoting Dish soap at the age of eleven. "Maybe it's because she grew up in Hollywood, but her life, even before she met Harry, had a dramatic quality. The father of one of her best friends was shot dead while working in his car body business by a Vietnam veteran who had just murdered his own family. There can not be many future Duchesses so touched by the random force of arms that is typical of American freak events. Markle is surely the only Sandringham guest who once worked in a Fro-yo business called Humphrey Yogart.

Until now, the most glamorous wedding that Markle has been associated with was by Robin Thicke and Paula Patton, for whom she did the calligraphy, in 2005. At the time, she also worked as a restaurant hostess and teaching gift wrapping in a stationery shop. She appeared in Tori Amo's "1000 Oceans" video and decrypted briefcases about "Deal or No Deal." Her acting career developed slowly: Passenger in a plane, FedEx girl. There was yoga, blogging, wine, car problems, a starter marriage. In 2011, she finally landed a lead role in the legal drama "Suits". At the same time she founded a lifestyle site called Tig. (It's a shame she had to close her recently because she's a good writer.) Last November, when she wrapped her last episode of Suits, she'd supported herself for the better part of two decades, an estimated five Million dollars. Her hustle and bustle sets her apart from Princess Margaret, who spent her time cleaning her clam collection, or from Camilla, who apparently referred to a relative as the "laziest woman" born in England in the 20th century. Markle will be the first gig.

There are already non-white European royals, including Princess Angela von Liechtenstein, who worked in fashion in New York before meeting her husband, Prince Maximilian. It is possible that some of the Windsors, whose highly colonial racism appears just as regular as the queen's midday Gin and Dubonnet, are privately appalled by the prospect of a colored woman joining their ranks. But Markle's arrival did not create the sort of crisis that struck in 1936 after Edward VIII fell in love with the divorced Wallis Simpson – "a pretty cauldron of fish," said the Queen Mother – or in 1953, when Princess Margaret wanted the divorced RAF marry group leader Peter Townsend. (The taboo against divorce was finally withdrawn when Prince Charles married Camilla.)

In a sense, Markle is already a member of the global elite. Her self-chosen trajectory led her from the United Nations, where she gave a speech on gender equality, to the Royal Lodge at Wimbledon, to which she was first invited not as a royal consort, but as a guest of the fashion brand Ralph Lauren. In March 2017, Markle and Harry visited a friend's wedding in Jamaica. "While Harry flew to the island in premium economy, his girlfriend borrowed a buddy's private jet," a British tabloid reported. Wealth has replaced race, class or marital status as a measure of eligibility for a royal partner. It seems that the exception is poor.

Markle attended the Catholic School and graduated from Northwestern University. She drank rosé on a bachelor weekend in Greece, traveled by camper to New Zealand and visited Afghanistan with the USA. During her shootings for "Suits" she lived for several years in Canada. She is more secular than some of her future in-laws, including the Duchess of Cambridge, who had never been to the United States after her wedding. (George V., when asked to make an official trip to Holland, replied, "Amsterdam, Rotterdam, and all the other dams – damn it, if I do!")

A royal marriage is an acquisition, not one Fusion. In Markle, the royal family has found someone who can refresh their corporate culture, even if it is subsumed by it. To marry into a family whose identity requires its own extinction is a tricky endeavor in the simplest cases. Some of Harry's former girlfriends were not interested in the prospect, however much they loved him. Markle will emigrate to England and become a British subject. She was recently baptized in the Church of England. When other women realized what a royal life would bring, they set off; Markle accepted a new country, a new nationality and a new religion. Her most striking attribute could be that she sees Harry's wife as an opportunity.

Royal romances are not fairytales. As some recent biographies show, they do not always or often have happy ending. It's less about passion than risk-free libido, high stakes transactions where the ratio of investment and return, give and take has to reach near-perfect balance so that the protagonists can go far beyond the first kiss

After Princess Margaret had given up marrying Townsend, she became the family's proudest sybarite, unlocking their values ​​by guiding them to their logical ends. She is the confusing anti-heroine of Craig Brown's "Ninety-Nine Insights from Princess Margaret." Brown, known for his satirical diary entries in the journal Private Eye foregoes the conventions of the royal biography of a small Dada portrait of the Queen's younger sister in chapters ranging between interviews, lists, letters, headlines , Diaries and invented dreams and vignettes fluctuate. Brown perfectly manages Margaret's sour, campy voice. His use of her grumpy quotes ("I'm very happy to declare this hut open now") can make you laugh aloud.

Margaret was also drawn to interrupt the dialogue. Her husband, photographer Antony Armstrong-Jones, had a habit of leaving notes on her desk and in her glove box, including one entitled, "Twenty Four Reasons I Hate You." It's the hideous defeats of him ("You look like a Jewish manicurist") and her Entourage company (which describes Margaret's complexion as "a dirty Negligee pink satin") that make the book so strangely sad , "Born in an age of reverence, the princess should die in an age of egalitarianism," writes Brown. "The attempt to span the two wanted to be treated as equal and superior and fluctuated from one moment to the next, between the carefree and the happy, their behavior often led to tears at bedtime." [196592002] Margaret is child's play compared to the pomp-obsessed, overarching protagonist of Tom Bower's "Rebel Prince: The Power, Passion and Defiance of Prince Charles." Bower, an investigative journalist, has the weaknesses of a number of powerful figures in the British establishment He says he writes as a "dedicated monarchist" who, after talking to more than 120 royal confidants – many of whom are former employees – "share their concern about whether Charles can become a monarch." possibly the sharpest depiction of Charles ever written. I searched the script of the book for something else when I found " CHARLES, PRINCE OF WALES ":

Character : refusing to take responsibility, xii, 7, 11, 25, 43, 270, 335; Self-doubt, xii, 11, 16, 90, 153-4; Disloyalty, XIII-XIV, 4-5, 13, 14, 26-7, 51, 96-7, 162, 210, 310, 335, 337; Victims of, xiii-xiv; 50-1, 93-4, 96-7, 210, 264, 310-11; Aversion to Criticism / Dissenting Views, XIV, 9, 11, 46, 52, 55, 74-5, 92; Scapegoats, 7, 14, 18, 129, 162; Self-pity, 7-8, 12-14, 16, 36, 38, 41, 43, 67-8, 243, 257; Intolerance / bad mood, 9, 11, 13, 14, 29, 49, 52, 125, 335; Feeling of superiority, 11, 43, 57, 58, 76; Resentment, 13, 14, 49, 335; Egoism, 14, 27, 62, 177, 210, 230, 319, 322; Grudge from Diana, 18-19, 62; derogatory comments about Diana, 24, 42, 61; on himself, 44-5, 67-8; Rudeness, 52, 88, 126, 138, 314-15, 322

Bower portrays Charles as a persnickicky Rangpuller who had apparently once sent his own bedroom furniture to a friend's house before a weekend stay. (Charles claims to have brought his own toilet seat, "Do not believe the crap.") He seems to be spending most of his time using his royal position to pay people for things he does not wanting to be seen because of his royal position. He and Camilla have met people for airplane rides and weeks on yachts, birthday parties and bathroom tiles, though Charles has an annual personal income of about twenty million pounds. (Brown suggests that Margaret in turn got the aristocrat Colin Tennant to give her a villa on Mustique, where she breeds a dissolute crowd, including an ex-con who once pleaded guilty to using a road surface as an offensive Weapon. ") Bower reports that Charles attempted to exchange one of his watercolors for a work by Lucian Freud." I do not want any of your lazy pictures, "Freud replied.

While the queen considers her birthright an honor, her eldest appears Son constantly hard to feel. "No one knows what the hell it is to be Prince of Wales," Bower quotes Charles, "It's not that Charles feels unworthy of the job." This has something to do with the culture of learning Charles wrote to a co-worker after a woman on his team inquired about ways to promote him, accusing "a child-centric system that is not a failure and let people know that they can all be pop stars, high judges, brilliant TV personalities, or even infinitely competent heads of state, without any effort or natural ability. "Charles must be relieved that the positions of Chief of the Armed Forces and defender of Faith currently occupied by his mother. Presumably, he believes he was portrayed on stamps because of his abilities.

Theoretically apolitical, Charles has tried to influence governments in ways that are both ridiculous and worrying. According to Bower, he once called a private secretary on Downing Street to ensure that Prime Minister Tony Blair adhered to royal etiquette by signing letters "Your obedient servant." He constantly talks to the ministers about urban planning, alternative medicine, climate change, the overfishing of Patagonian toothfish. (A series of letters known as "black spider" memos, due to Charles's handwriting, were published by the Freedom of Information Act, of which members of the royal family are usually exempt.)

Over the years He has managed to divert considerable public funds for his pet initiatives. Bower, for example, writes that under the pressure of Charles, the Department of Health has agreed to give many millions of pounds to the Royal London Homeopathic Hospital. In a speech to the Royal Institute of British Architects, he condemned the proposed expansion of the National Gallery as a "monstrous carbuncle on the face of a very popular and elegant friend." as well as a modernist plan of three billion pounds to redevelop the Chelsea Barracks. (He added his own preferred design to a letter he sent to a Qatari sheikh whose family had agreed to finance the plan.) Charles is understandably passionate about his cause. Every time he argues for "the old-fashioned" – I would call them timeless – virtues of squares, mansion blocks and terraces ", he argues for himself.

Charles & # 39; authority makes more sense given the humiliating treatment he received from his parents. It has to be grief, believing that you're destined to be a nation, then fifty, and that your mother and father skipped your birthday instead of being seen in your girlfriend's company. The queen looks rather petty and submits to Camilla as she tries to join the family, a series of deeper and deeper impressions. Camilla, who does not like "hot countries" according to Bower, also has her moments, but she is a winning frivolous Inamorata. Charles seems to believe that the injuries sustained during the persecution of her relationship are so serious that the monarchy always owes him one.

In April, as anticipation of the marriage of Harry and Meghan rose, a psychiatrist issued warnings in the press A fascination for the royal family could lead to mental health problems. For many of us, however, we go deep into the weed of ownership (the Queen technically owns all the porpoises, whales, sturgeon and dolphins that live within three miles of Britain's shores); Priority (Kate needs Knicks to Beatrice and Eugenie if she meets them alone, but she must knicksy her if she is with William); and etiquette (little boy royals wear shorts, no pants) is a very relaxing pastime whose value is directly related to its sharpness. It is a form of what the queen would hardly call self-sufficiency. If the phrase "Honestly, I think he wants to be creamed and have a good night-dip" – that was a private secretary, Prince Harry apologizes from one night – is no pleasure, then I do not know what is. What lover of language or people would not want to know that the favorite expression of Cressida Bonas, one of Harry's old flames, is "crise de la cringe"?

The master of royals' life is Andrew Morton, who published "Diana: Her True Story" in 1992, a fundamentally formative "biography" that was basically dictated by his theme. (Diana had a friend smuggle tapes to describe her abuse of her husband and family from Kensington Palace by bicycle.) "Diana" is the kind of book you read, preferably in a bathing suit. I recently found two copies – a paperback, a hardcover – in a holiday home. Morton, who is now married to an American, spends part of the year in California, where he has turned into the illicit life of movie stars. It is unlikely that he has positioned himself in exile perfectly to make another exhaustive contribution to the royal literature. "To Carolyn and all our friends in Pasadena," reads the dedication of "Meghan: A Hollywood Princess."

Morton was a boulevard journalist in the UK, and "Meghan" is a work of shoe leather or tire rubber or whatever you go through when reporting Bejesus from a book in and around the San Fernando Valley. It represents the most complete account given by Meghan's pre-Harry years, and even her pre-Meghan families, who offer a sinisterly emblematic capsule course on American history, from the Georgia Cotton Plantation, where their maternal ancestors were enslaved. Realization Fellowship Temple on Sunset Boulevard, where her parents married in 1979 after meeting on the set of the General Hospital. Meghan was born two years later. Her mother, Doria Ragland, worked as a make-up artist and later became a social worker. Her father, Tom Markle, had two teenage children from a previous marriage – a daughter who got into witchcraft and a son with a waterbed and a go-kart.

No anecdote is too small to record. We learn that Tom once went to a restaurant with an imaginary parrot on his shoulder ("It was hilarious," recalls his first wife), and that Meghan was born at 4:46 A.M. We learn the names of bird and obstetrician. Morton's approach to the randomness-detail approach gives a vivid sense of how Markle's life is different from a royal upbringing:

Tom not only spent every waking minute with his daughter, in his idiosyncratic manner he tried to impose a little discipline on the disciples somewhat laissez-faire household to protect his little "flower". Although he had always told his son that if he and his friends wanted to smoke grass, they should only do it indoors, this instruction changed on the arrival of the baby. On one occasion, Tom Junior and his friends smoked a dumpling in the living room while Meghan cried in the nursery. His father loudly announced that he went upstairs to change her diaper. Shortly thereafter, he appeared with a full diaper in the living room. He joined the boys on the sofa, took a spoon out of his pocket, and began to eat the contents of the diaper. The boys had fled out of the house. Only later did he reveal that he had earlier spooned chocolate pudding into a fresh diaper. It was his way of keeping the boys from smoking grass when Meghan was around.

As Californian Gothic surpasses the Joan Didion. It may also help to explain why Tom Markle, Jr. recently published a handwritten letter in In Touch Weekly calling his half-sister a "truncated, flat, conceited woman" and urging Prince Harry to retire , the biggest mistake in the Royal Wedding History.

Tom, Jr.'s childhood could not be as grotesque as his future brother-in-law's got in. For Harry, the family drama began in utero: Charles wanted a girl, Diana knew she had a boy and told it William and Harry were both sent to boarding school at the age of 8. When Charles and Diana split up, their mother interrupted the news in her headmaster's study, and when she died in Paris in the summer of 1997, they had them for a month Even after they lost them, the princes could not trust their close relative.Some years later, Charles's brother Edward turned up in St. Andrews, where William was a freshman student and was planning to make friends

Harry sympathizers become "Harry: Lives, Loss, and Love," by Katie Nicholl, who began her royal-journalistic career quite abruptly in 2003. " I was a young reporter who reported on a party at Kensington Roof Gardens in London, when Harry, having his own soiree in the VIP room, invited me to join him, "she recalls." Over the years, she has become reckless Their books contain revelations that are only interesting enough to qualify as scoops without jeopardizing their network of well-placed sources, to reach the part in "Harry" where Harry and Meghan find each other Having to meet early at Soho House means you have to endure a lot about your military career and charity work. "Harry's search for a wife and a meaningful role in his life was long and sometimes laborious; a battle on many fronts. But only when we understand this struggle, we can really understand Prince Harry, "Nicholl writes in a passage that might also characterize the experience of reading her book.

According to Nicholl, Harry has become" royally "of a sometimes idiosyncratic type An impressive young man. "In the years prior to his relationship with Meghan, he was lacking direction, a problem Nicholl attributes to the unresolved anger over his mother's death. Even when Nicholl tries to ridicule Harry, he comes off easily. Nicholl writes of an island vacation that Harry made with a friend's family: "In the evening, the family would meet for" beach "playing games on the beach if they were" volcanoes "vodka shots It was the kind of family vacation Harry had never experienced before, and he was happier than he had been in a long time. "You feel a bit Harry, but you're not sure if he's Love or vodka loves. [196592002] Harry is a magnet for trouble he never seems to have made, such as the time he came to a birthday party as a twenty-year-old member of Rommel's German Afrika Korps. The party's theme, "native and colonial," was terrible enough, even without the swastika, but Nicholl is not one who questions the upper classes. She is mainly responsible for Harry's protection officers. In 2009, a video was made, in which Harry called one of his fellow campaigners a "faghead" and another "my little Paki friend." Nicholl writes, "What should have been an exciting new chapter in the prince's career was overshadowed by race series, and again Harry was right in the middle of it." Well, yes.

It is also the guilt of the bodyguards when, a few years later, the tabloids print photographs of Harry, naked except for a leather necklace. Strip pool with a group of young women in a hotel suite in Las Vegas. Nicholl is so indulgent of Harry's misconduct that she does not seem to recognize the implications of a "comic episode" told by the late Tara Palmer-Tomkinson, a friend of the Windsor family:

His girlfriend Melissa Percy lives next door to me, and one night, I think it was after the royal wedding, Harry was over and they had a party. Our roof terraces connect and suddenly I heard an accident. Harry had jumped over the flower pots and knocked on my terrace at my patio door. Of course, I was a little surprised to see him and let him in. The next thing I knew was that he kissed me, a real French kiss! He drew a star on my forehead with his finger and said, "Close your eyes, beautiful girl, tickle, tickle, kiss, kisses," and the next thing he was gone. I was pretty baffled, to say the least, but that was typical of Harry – he's a lovable bunch.

Wondering if Palmer-Tomkinson saw the calculations of 2018, what she might have thought of this kiss

Markle, whose father is of Dutch and Irish descent and whose mother is African-American, describes herself as a race. She was politically very open from her youth. "I watch in horror as both sides of a culture that I define as my own become victims of spin in the media, maintain stereotypes and remind us that states may have only put on bandages about the issues that never hit healed the root, "she wrote a few years ago. In the fall of 2016, just after it became known that Markle and Harry were seeing each other, Harry issued a statement condemning the violation of their privacy. "It was explosive, unprecedented and highly flammable," writes Nicholl. (Howlers are another attraction of the genre.) It was certainly unusual for the royal family in their sensitivity to political correctness. Recognizing the fact that Markle was his girlfriend, Harry criticized the press and specifically criticized "the racial undertones of the commentaries, and the open sexism and racism of social media trolls and web article comments."

Obviously, this meant one certain hypocrisy in the face of Harry's story and that of his family. For almost a century, Prince Philip has made "derailments" that would not be out of place at a U.K.I.P. Rally; Princess Michael of Kent recently appeared for the Queen's Christmas dinner, in which Markle also attended, allegedly by chance wearing a black mother brooch. ("A Cheetah & # 39; s Tale," the memoirs of big cats recently released by the Princess in colonial Mozambique, contains such memoirs as: "Of course, it had been Rosemarie's idea to borrow him from friends in exchange for one of their house handlers, the she wanted to learn English. ") Nicholl, for once, does not take a particularly charitable look at Harry's maneuver, suggesting he made him look hotheaded. But you can see it as a sign of change, a productive channeling of Harry's raw energy. The party prince finally made something cool.

"I wanted to give her a chance to think about it – to consider whether it would all be too horrible," Charles told reporters of his decision to ask Diana to marry him Just as she was going on vacation. That sounded like the stuttering of a self-satisfied Toff in 1981. Today, when his sons express similar feelings, they appear genuinely apologetic. There's nothing stickier than being a king, and the younger ones seem to know that. In the same video in which Harry mocked his "Paki friend," he made a fake call to the queen, "Granny, I have to go, send my love to the corgis and grandpa." He is aware of this identity leaves him open to ridicule, which he anticipates with kitsch. "Is there any member of the royal family who wants to be king or queen?" Harry said in an interview in 2017. "I do not think so, but we'll fulfill our duties at the right time."

On the occasion of the marriage of Charles and Diana, the royal biographer Hugo Vickers wrote in a diary entry: "The royal wedding is no more romantic than a picnic amid the wasps." For centuries, royal weddings have been used for assortative mating exercises involving young people Well, the line will be matched with partners who are very similar to themselves. In 1959, the pregnant queen was warned about a complicated and misguided saga involving her maiden name that Prince Andrew, without paternity, would be born with "the badge of Bastard". She allowed her offspring to be known as Mountbatten -Windsor. It is interesting to think about how Markle would have been received had she fallen in love with William instead of Harry, the heir instead of the second son. She is almost thirty-seven. Have the palace mandarins analyzed their fertility? Had they pushed the use of certain reproductive technologies or prohibited others? Can a dynasty perpetuate love instead of blood?

Privilege is not a good look today, not even for an institution based on it. But the Windsors are developing slowly. In March, Kensington Palace announced that more than a thousand members of British schoolchildren, charity workers, had been invited to Windsor Castle in an attempt to make Harry and Meghan's wedding more inclusive. While the ceremony takes place in the castle chapel, they will spend more than four hours outside. They were asked to have their own lunch. ♦


Source link