قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / US / New York City insiders are stepping up their attacks on Andrew Yang

New York City insiders are stepping up their attacks on Andrew Yang



Did Yang Yang become interesting? The mayor’s leader has recently developed the habit of developing reasonable, even grand advice to manage Gotham’s advice, which drives his opponents crazy. Yang has not proven that he is ready to become mayor, but his competitors have not even shown disgust at his most obvious ideas, indicating that they have not yet.

Yang’s least interesting or constructive idea is his signature issue: universal basic income. Last year, he ran for president and gave each adult in the United States $1,000 a month. The idea is to let the poor choose what to do with money, rather than giving them vouchers for housing, food, etc. UBI provides everyone else with weapons to prevent wage stagnation, work automation and offshore outsourcing.

The Big Apple cannot give each adult $1

,000 a month. It will cost 80 billion U.S. dollars each year, more than taxes. Therefore, Yang provided a stripped-down version of his “universal” plan: $167 per month for the poorest 500,000 New Yorkers. But he never explained key details.

However, ignoring UBI, Yang has other useful ideas. Last week, he advised the city not to increase taxes on the highest-income people because it might drive them away. “If you raise taxes, … people actually vote with their feet and go to Florida, then you are not reaching the goal of the policy.

Yang also suggested that the city consider incentives to lure suburban workers who have been away from their Manhattan desks for a year to give them another chance to commute. This is also worth trying: why not give people vouchers to take the commuter train, which expires in a few months, and let those bored people try to enter town at home? (Young’s competitor and city auditor Scott Stringer can accuse him of “municipal re-education.”)

Yang also suggested that Mayor Bill de Blasio (Bill de Blasio) not use all of the $6 billion in relief we received from the Federal Reserve. Yang said that since the city may face years of fiscal deficits, it is prudent to place squirrels in 70% of the area.

This is wise, but another competitor, Maya Wiley, the former legal counsel of de Blasio, attacked him. Her spokesperson said: “Our city deserves a serious leader, not a mini Trump.”??

Brooklyn President Eric Adams does not need policy reasons to deal with Yang.At an event recognized by the union (he should have been in a good mood), Adams said that “people like Andrew Yang” “never have been [their] The whole life. . . . You will not come to this city, thinking you will ignore the people. ”

Yang is a lawyer. He worked in start-up companies, ran a school testing company, and founded and ran a non-profit training organization to become an entrepreneur in a struggling city. He has always had a job. He has lived in New York for 25 years.

The reason behind the attack is that insiders are increasingly afraid of outsiders.

Industry insiders believe that with the attention of voters, Yang’s leading position will disappear. Young received about 16% of the vote, followed by Adams. Half of the voters are still undecided.

But the idea that people suddenly want to understand who Stringer and Adams are and get excited about them is quite trivial. As shown in the latest Fontas Advisors poll, it is certain that 85% of people know who Yang is.

But they also knew that Stringer and Adams were 64% and 62% respectively. Wiley’s ratio is 42%, and there is room for self-introduction. No one else.

Stringer and Adams also face threats from other low-profile candidates. Ray McGuire is a professional investment banker. Kathryn Garcia is in charge of the health department. Only one-third of voters know who they are. As voters learn, they may like what they see and cut into undecided decisions.

The final wildcard: voting for ranked selection. Of course, Adams and Stringer can compete for a few votes with each other, and then see everyone separate their first choice, and then choose Yan, a Yankee player who is amiable with Yan, as the second choice, putting him first.

Yang’s critics are not entirely wrong: he has shown an unfamiliar dislike of the city government, and some of his ideas (such as building a casino on Governors Island) are just weird and stupid. But for voters who want to change in the crisis, his well-known main competitors are too familiar with the government.

Nicole Gelinas is a contributing editor of the “City Daily”.

Twitter: @NicoleGelinas


Source link