قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / US / McConnell criticized the anti-racism focus of Biden’s rules, calling them “divisive”

McConnell criticized the anti-racism focus of Biden’s rules, calling them “divisive”



From Idaho to Missouri to Rhode Island, state legislatures across the country have made similar efforts as Republicans try to restrict how public schools teach about race and racism. They specifically target critical racial theory, which is an academic movement that believes that historical patterns of racial discrimination have caused disadvantages based on race, and these disadvantages have always existed in the modern power system.

On his first day in office, Biden signed an executive order stating that the federal government should “take a comprehensive approach to promote equality for all people, especially people of color.” These people have been underserved throughout history. Being marginalized and adversely affected by persistent poverty and inequality. “

Biden wrote in the order: “Our country is facing ever-increasing economic, health, and climate crises, which expose and exacerbate inequality, and the historic justice movement highlights the difficulties that systematic racism has caused to humanity. The price to bear.”

The government’s proposed rules that Mr. McConnell and others protested did not require any changes to the curriculum. Instead, it lists priorities for federal competition or grant programs, and schools can choose to apply for these programs to “take into account systemic marginalization, prejudice, inequality, and discriminatory policies and practices in American history.” In addition to citing the 1619 plan, the rule also cited the work of Ibram X. Kendi, the author of the book “How to Become an Anti-Racist.”

It said: “It is vital that the teaching of American history and citizenship must create learning experiences that can verify and reflect the diversity, identity, history, contribution, and experience of all students,”

Mr. McConnell and other Republicans condemned this point in the letter.

They wrote: “The youth of our country do not need to rely solely on the deficiencies of the past and divide the country into radicalism instilled in the camp of divisions,” “A taxpayer-backed plan should emphasize the common civic virtues that unite us, and It’s not pushing the radical agenda that divides us.”

They also argued that the “1619 Project” was notorious for putting unwise advocacy before historical accuracy, and “citing this debunked claim to confirm that your priorities will not be focused on critical thinking or In accurate history, it’s about spoon-feeding to give students an oblique story.”


Source link