Tina Hendrix tells billboard Her family “disappointed and disappointed with the judge’s decision. I strongly believe that this is incorrect and for several reasons.”
The contempt decision for Leon and Tina Hendrix began after a long court battle. This battle started in 2017, when the experience Hendrix LLC (the sole owner of the late rock musician’s musical works, recordings, copyrights and trademarks) and Authentic Hendrix LLC (the company’s authorized agency) Hendrix filed an infringement lawsuit. The experienced and true Hendrix sued Leon Hendrix and its business partners for trademark infringement, fraud and false advertising.
In October 201
In July of the following year, the court formally passed an injunction prohibiting the experience of Hendrix, LLC and Authentic Hendrix, LLC, and opposed “Leon Hendrix, its legal entity”. . . Partner,. . “And the judgment against Leon $ 402,018.53. But only three months later, the experienced and true Hendricks told the court that Leon and Tina Hendricks violated the court’s permanent injunction.
“Experiencing Hendrix is just trying to deprive Jimi Hendrix’s close relatives of the bequest right at all costs. Apart from the company’s greed, the purpose is nothing more than spreading misinformation to the public that they are Jimi’s family alone. [when] Actually not. “Tina Hendrix continued. “This struggle has nothing to do with money, but the right to use one’s family name for charitable purposes. This is more about freedom of speech. This order and the previous order in this case violated our rights. This is the default judgment against my father. “
She added: “It surprises me that the court supported Hendrix’s experience and deprived us of the right to use our own surname for life. This is a rare situation. The plaintiff acquired Hendrix’s name through adoption and has been using it. , Obtained millions of dollars in revenue from Jimi Hendrix’s music, and at the same time used the proceeds to eliminate Jimi’s relatives and family members one by one, first Jimi’s son, then Jimmy’s brother, and now his niece. When we opened a free music school, I never made a dollar from my uncle.”
Although the court prohibits Leon from using the names “Jimi Hendrix”, “Jimi”, “Hendrix” in any form. . . ; Any Hendrix registered or pending trademarks. . . ; Or any image, portrait or signature of Jimi Hendrix. . . He in any way, including but not limited to selling, naming, identifying, selling, marketing, labeling, packaging, promoting, distributing or advertising any products or services, or any way related to goods and services. “According to court documents, an interview conducted to advertise and promote the so-called Jimi Hendrix guitar.
In addition, the court stated that Leon and Tina Hendrix hosted and sponsored a proceeds to raise funds for their non-profit “Jimi Hendrix Music” and The accompanying Jimi Hendrix T-shirt is sold on its website, with the image of Hendrix printed on the front, Hendrix quotes, and a protected Jimi Hendrix signature on the back.
Tina Hendrix argued in the court pleading that the funds raised for HMA Academy were used for non-profit charities, but the court stated that non-profit status does not exempt them from complying with permanent Obligations for sexual injunctions. Engelmayer also ordered Leon to pay the lawyer’s fees against the lawyer, saying that if Leon and Tina Hendrix did not comply, they could also be fined higher, and said Leon” Put your prison key in your pocket”.
Tina Hendrix tells billboard“I just want to educate my children about Jimi and use his name for non-profit purposes. My grandfather gave us this right in 1988. Everything we receive from Jimmy fans belongs to the students and them Owned by his family. Over the past ten years, we have proudly served many families in need in memory of Jimmy. This work will never interfere with Hendrix’s business or profits, only their lies. We are currently eager To seek free legal advice, and we intend to fight it until the end. Since my father was born in 1948, we have been called the Hendrix family. Why should we keep silent when we are the only ones who can tell the history of the family And prevent it from telling the history of the family? This is an example of how to rewrite historical records based on greed to accommodate lies and spread false information as facts.”