قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / US / Jeff Van Drew: New Jersey Congressman’s oath of “uninterrupted support” for Trump hangs in the balance

Jeff Van Drew: New Jersey Congressman’s oath of “uninterrupted support” for Trump hangs in the balance

His GOP debut coincided with a daunting year for his new party. But he said his transition was “good.”

Van der Rohe said: “The real benefit is that I feel free, because I have no one to tell me what you can vote and can’t vote. This is what really started.”

Van Drew’s Democratic challenger, Amy Kennedy, a former teacher, was born and raised in New Jersey. She is also the son of former Senator Ted Kennedy and the wife of former Representative Patrick Kennedy.

However, the nominal game is only played between Kennedy and Van Drew. Just like in the nationwide ballot contest this year, Trump is getting bigger and bigger here-perhaps because of the public support between Van Drew and the president.
Patrick Murray, director of the Monmouth University Poll Institute, said: “The most important thing is actually the primary election.”
; A recent survey of the game in the Second Congressional District of New Jersey was conducted. “This time it is much more difficult to establish your own independent voice than in the past.”
The 10 House of Representatives districts are most likely to flip two weeks before and after election day

A year ago, close ties with Trump might not sound like a bad thing in New Jersey. The president won the election in the region by 5 points in 2016; in January, when Trump went there for a victory circle rally with Van Drew, thousands of supporters lined up in the bitter cold. Van Drew (Van Drew) recalled the scene that night, recalled the atmosphere so prosperous that a game “only spontaneous combustion.”

But this was before Trump stumbled to deal with the global pandemic, before tens of thousands of Americans lost their jobs, before 2020 and before the election shifted sharply in the other direction.

Now, Trump’s recognition may not be enough at all, if it’s completely positive, and as election day approaches, the president lags behind the polls, and former mayor and state councilor Van Drew tries to remind voters of his brand. After more than 20 years of training in the field of public service, he has cultivated an independent-minded politician who does not care about party labels.

Van Drew said: “I don’t always agree with what the Republicans are doing, or even what the president is doing. The president knows that I am involved.” “I voted independently. I am Jeff Van Drew as before.”

However, if some high-risk Republican candidates are hedging Trump’s support, Van der Rohe insists that he is not one of them.

Indeed, Van Drew’s campaign website still had large banner photos of his Oval Office shaking hands, swallowing most of the screen. Van Drew was a guest speaker at the Republican National Convention this summer. The windows of his campaign office clearly bear the Van Drew 2.0 logo: not only the Van Drew logo (printed on the yard logo this year in a new bright GOP red hue), but also the Trump logo. The Van Drew campaign shares an office with Trump’s operations in New Jersey.

Van der Rohe said: “I will not stay away from people.” “…Whether I am a Republican or a Democrat, whether you always agree with the president or not, I don’t think you just betrayed him and walked away. I don’t think this is correct.”

“I actually feel betrayed”

Some Democratic voters who supported Van der Rohe two years ago believed that this was exactly what he did to them. They only changed parties a year after Van der Rohe was sent to Washington.

Democratic voter David Burr said: “Actually, I feel that I would betray him.” He voted for Kennedy this year. “It doesn’t seem that he is thinking about me, he is considering continuing to serve.”

Not only voters: Van der Rohe’s decision also made party leaders tolerant. Van Drew announced that a few days ago, House Majority Leader Snyy Hoyer held a lunch reception for members of Congress in a townhouse on Capitol Hill. Hall said that there, despite being from a moderate area, he praised Van der Rohe’s loyalty to the party. Donors have issued checks for as much as $5,000 for Van der Rohe’s reelection campaign; Hoyer has done his best.

A few days later, Van Drew had a private meeting with Trump for an hour and a half in the White House. In his story, they talked about family and recalled Trump’s early business adventures in Atlantic City and the misfortune of crossing the road. By the end of lunch, Van der Rohe agreed to switch parties.

When reports of the meeting began to leak to the media, Hoyer heard the news from a phone call from his political team.

Hoyer said: “I am not a happy camper.”

Van Drew insisted that the fundraising activities were “carried out in advance” and he did not participate in the meeting with the president to plan a party change. Van der Rohe added: “Frankly, I hope that Steiny will support me not only because I am a Democrat, but because I work hard.”

Either way, his decision ran an important political campaign against the Democrats and made it an individual. For Democrats who feel burnt to death by Van Drew, there is a certain karma in the development of this election year, with Trump and frontline Republicans struggling to survive.

Hoyer said: “If you are an opportunist, you better make sure the grass over there is actually greener.”

The danger of the converter

In any political environment, party switching is far from a definite winner.

Van Drew claimed to be “the only person in American history to switch from a majority party to a minority party” and insisted that others who did this would gain the chairmanship and greater political influence. But this is incorrect, even in recent political history.

In 2009, Representative Parker Griffith of Alabama became a Republican, and Democrats controlled the House of Representatives. Prior to this, New York Rep. Michael Forbes had taken the opposite approach in 1999-changing from a Republican to a Democrat, and the Republican Party controlled the House of Representatives. In both cases, there was no success: Griffith and Forbes failed in their respective (new) party primaries the following year.

At least for Van der Rohe, the controversial Republican primaries were not a problem after the Republicans rolled out the red carpet for him. In addition to Trump’s recognition of Van Drew, the President’s Re-election Committee immediately invested $250,000 in the advertisement to thank members of Congress for changing parties and supporting the president.

However, if the Republican Party welcomes Van Drew with open arms, voters in the region may make another calculation.

Murray of Monmouth said: “Van der Rohe has been successful throughout his career. He is not a typical politician, and he is not a person who is paranoid about party interests.” “However, many voters think completely in this way. The change of his party is political self-protection.”

In a sense it is so. When Van Drew was preparing to vote against the impeachment of the president last year, his campaign team shared with him an internal poll, stating that this position would make him doomed to fail in the Democratic primary. Converting to the Republican Party is difficult to guarantee a return ticket to Washington, but at least this is not a certain political death penalty.

However, this may be a wise choice. In a Monmouth poll on race earlier this month, only 35% of voters in the Van Drew area said that they were “very troubled” by his party change. At the same time, 51% said that this is not a problem at all.

Van der Rohe said: “I think the first decisive factor is that some people may say that this is the fact that I changed the party. I don’t believe this will happen.” “I think the first decisive factor is me.”

Key moments in the game

There is no doubt that the bigger problem for Van der Rohe will be that the moment Trump Van der Rohe assured the president that he “always provide eternal support” symbolizes their alliance.

Kennedy said that it was that moment that prompted her to start running.

Kennedy said: “I have no intention of running for office.” “But when I heard these words,’I will always assure you of my unremitting support’, I felt that this was someone who was definitely not there to seek our best interests. This forced I have to want to escape.”

This January photo provided by Amy Kennedy for the Congressional campaign shows Kennedy's appearance in Brigantine, New Jersey.

Now, this moment has become a symbol of the campaign-Van Drew feels a headache, he, like voters in his area, saw his voice bitten, and “over and over” according to his count in this year’s Play in offensive ads. .

In an interview with CNN this week, we asked Van Drew if he regretted having followed him over the past few months and may now re-elect him.

Van der Rohe admitted: “I don’t think these words can fully explain my true feelings.” “No matter what you say I am going to do, or my disapproval of support, no matter what you say, I will express my unyielding support. This is For the presidency, the great American ideas, the immortal support of friendship, but not necessarily I will agree with everything.”

But it is not clear whether voters will understand his meaning and his words.

Van der Lu said: “I think voters understand that when you work in the Oval Office, you are very excited and you are making some history,” sometimes we all say something.

A few minutes later, after our conversation continued, Van der Rohe stopped the wording in the middle of the sentence and then re-expressed what he meant. Then, realizing his humor, he intermittently with himself again. Under his mask, he might allow a smile.

“Look at what you said wrong?” He said, piercing the air mischievously, causing his Jersey accent to thicken. “Well, I have a chance to fix it this time.”

Source link