Renowned astronomers David Grinspoon and Alan Stern have worked to make Pluto a planet again after data collection using the New Horizons probe.  The decision to revoke Pluto's planetary status met with great distrust both among the members of the scientific community and among the general public, who were dismayed at the loss of one of the planets that had been part of our training
However, new geological data seems to indicate that it might be wise to make Pluto a planet again. In a Washington Post column, Grinspoon and Stern write that "the verdict of revaluing the planetary concept and dethroning Pluto from the planet list was profoundly flawed, and the decision was even challenged by followers of similar activists."
In reality, the decision to turn Pluto into a planet can be used well because the decision to remove it as a planet was made in 2006 by a small group of astronomers where the majority of participants have different thoughts and ideas Opinions About It
The fact that so many people were unsure whether we should continue to make Pluto a planet should raise questions about whether it makes sense to change status, but new evidence makes it even more clear that the revocation of the status could have been a mistake.
The problem lies in the way in which these astronomers decided to define what a planet actually is. For example, they defined a planet as something orbiting our sun, which completely devalues the numerous exoplanets that exist outside of our solar system.
Perhaps it is more bizarre that planets were defined by what was near them, the planet itself. The case of making Pluto a planet can have solid ground, if you just look at the planet itself – despite the fact that he does not make the cut because he "threw enough weight to eject all the other objects nearby."
It is also noteworthy that the distinction between dwarf planets and planets is relatively unnecessary – almost as if it were an effort to "demote" Pluto for an arbitrary reason and make it clear that it would be a good idea, Pluto Making a Planet Full Status
At a recent Lunar and Planetary Science Conference, a group of scientists held a presentation titled "A Geophysical Planet Definition," in which they pleaded to make Pluto a planet again and, by and large, to redefine what a planet actually is.
"In line with the science-based classification and intuition of humans, we propose a geophysical-based definition of 'planet' that clearly highlights the body-I ntrinsic physical properties via its extrinsic orbital properties"
" A simple paraphrase of our planetary definition – especially suitable for elementary school students – could read: "Round objects in space that are smaller than stars."
It remains as if the scientific community will decide to make Pluto a planet again, but it it is clear that the decision to demote her at all could be misguided, and those who complained about the loss of their favorite planet might soon recover when Grinspoon and Stern make their way.