قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / US / Fact check: Georgia Republicans ran more misleading offensive ads targeting Warnock and Ossoff

Fact check: Georgia Republicans ran more misleading offensive ads targeting Warnock and Ossoff



Since then, Republicans have placed other misleading advertisements that attacked Democratic candidates Rafael Warnock and Jon Osoff. Below is a breakdown of two of these ads.

Republican Senator Kelly Loeffler worked together to describe Warnock, the senior pastor of the Ebenezer Baptist Church in Atlanta, as “radical” and “dangerous.”

As well-documented evidence, Loeffler’s advertisement ran a short excerpt, which included an excerpt from Warnock’s comments on “ending mass incarceration” at a meeting held at his church last year.
At least two of the Loeffler ads showed Warnock saying: “Someone has to open the prison and let our children go.” At least one of the ads has shorter quotes: “Someone has to put The prison is open.”
;

Fact first: All these Loeffler ads misled Warnock’s remarks. He advocates for the release of people sentenced especially for marijuana crimes, rather than full release of people sentenced for various crimes.

In fact, Loeffler’s own campaign posted a video on YouTube in early November that showed what Warnock commented on.

What he said is: “Cannabis is considered an illegal drug. This is a very ironic irony, and we feel that now in the United States, some people become billionaires because they sell the same things. These things make our children all Was locked up. All of America. Where is justice? Just legalizing marijuana is not enough. Someone must open the prison and let our children go.”

Loeffler is free to criticize Warnock for advocating the release of people imprisoned for marijuana crimes. But these advertisements give the impression that he is advocating amnesty for all prisoners. He is not.

“Pastor Warnock supports efforts to clear the records of those convicted of non-violent crimes not related to marijuana and works in the community to help clear records so that Georgians serving sentences can seek employment and housing opportunities without discrimination. “The campaign said in an email to CNN.

Osov and the Senate Committee

An advertisement in the campaign of Republican Senator David Perdue claimed that Ossoff “may initially deduct certain amounts from the Senate’s financial disclosure form and therefore may face a federal investigation “.
Fact first: This statement is highly misleading.The assumption that Osoff may face a federal investigation is based on the Georgia Republican Party Sent a letter Request an investigation to the Senate Ethics Committee. But any party member can write to the committee asking for anything, and there is currently no evidence that an ethics investigation is actually being considered.Osov Mention Revised the July disclosure form, which lists payments.
Since December 9, Fox News has published an article claiming that Osov may be subject to federal investigation.
In the 1970s and 1980s, the U.S. House of Representatives General Counsel Stanley Brand (Stanley Brand) said: “The fact that someone filed a complaint has no legal status. This is just a simple charge.” Cases and criminal cases. “Someone must be aware of this and study it, and my guess is that no one will study it.”
The committee is known for its reluctance to take action on the actions of members of the Senate. In this case, it is necessary to claim jurisdiction over the alleged issues before Osov took office. Brand said: “I just don’t see what they call technical and secondary.”
The Georgia Republican Party’s allegation is that Ossoff, the CEO of a company that produces investigative films, deliberately failed to disclose the payment he received from the Hong Kong company PCCW Media in May-in the company , A state-owned Chinese company owns minority ownership shares-from Al Jazeera.
However, Ossoff submitted a revised form in July, which lists these payments as well as payments from other media companies around the world. He listed payment methods from 32 media companies in July, and 21 disclosed in May.
We can’t forgive May’s omission, but it’s common for senators and candidates to propose amendments that release information not included in the first draft. As Ossoff’s campaign pointed out, Perdue himself has proposed amendments many times.

The ad uses a revised version of Ossoff to imply that he has a “China scandal”, claiming that the Democrats are “paid by the Chinese Communist government through a media company.”The advertisement continues to imply that the payment is suspicious, and explicitly asks: “Why China true Will it be paid to Osoff? ”

There is no evidence in the advertisement that the Chinese government paid Osov for malicious reasons. Ossoff’s campaign stated that his company received approximately $1,000 in royalties because Hong Kong media company PCCW (PCCW) announced two investigations into ISIS war crimes.

We cannot independently verify the explanation of the reason for the payment or the total amount of the Ossoff campaign, but neither Purdue campaign nor anyone else provided a reliable alternative explanation or alternative figures. The payment of documentary license fees from media companies in which the Chinese government is not majority-owned to media merchants is not high and is certainly not enough to prove that the advertisement portrays Osov as suspicious of China.

In addition, the Ossoff campaign also stated that it actually paid about $1,000 to Ossoff’s company, which was not paid by the Hong Kong company itself but by the third-party media production and distribution company Sky Vision. The author licensed the investigation to Hong Kong companies and other companies worldwide).

The campaign said that Osoff listed PCCW itself in the revised disclosure form because he wanted to be transparent about who was broadcasting the company’s work. The campaign said that transparency was also the reason he listed PCCW on the form, even if the payment was below the $5,000 threshold required for reporting.




Source link