قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / US / Facebook, Twitter, Google CEO testified in the Senate

Facebook, Twitter, Google CEO testified in the Senate



The chief executives of the three top US technology companies, namely Google, Twitter and Facebook, came under fire on Wednesday for the Senate review issues and were rejected by the Senate panel of experts. This is especially to prevent the “Post” from reporting on Hunter Biden’s business dealings in Ukraine and China.

Senator Roger Wicker, chairman of the Senate Commerce Committee, asked Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey (Jack Dorsey) why social media platforms posted signs of postal draws on President Trump’s post, but Allow the tweet “Praise the Iranian Ayatollah ali Khamenei for his violence against Israel” to remain on the website as it is.

“Mr. Dorsey, is it acceptable according to your policy?”

; Wicker asked.

Dorsey said: “We believe that the important thing is that everyone should listen to the opinions of global leaders.”

“We want to make sure we respect their right to speak and publish what they need. However, if it violates our terms of service,” Twitter flagged it as doing so.

“Did they violate your terms of service,” Vic pressed.

He said: “We did not find these violations of our terms of service, because we believe that they are part of the speeches of world leaders and other countries.”

Dorsey testified alongside Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook and Sundar Pichai of Google.

They are expected to answer questions about their business practices, the blockade of the “Washington Post” story, and the withdrawal of the liability protection that technology giants received from Section 230 of the Communications Act.

Wicker started the hearing and improved Twitter and Facebook’s ability to block the Post’s story, claiming it was based on hacked material.

“It’s worth noting that Twitter and Facebook’s aversion to hacked material is not always so strict. For example, when the president’s tax returns were illegally leaked, neither company took action to restrict access to that information. Likewise. , The steel dossiers whose credits have now been cancelled are also widely shared, without the check or disclaimer,” he said.

He warned that technology companies have become too powerful.

“My concern is that these platforms have become powerful arbiters for judging the truth and what content users can access. When content is reviewed, the American public knows almost nothing about the decision-making process, and when content is reviewed or restricted, users are There is almost no recourse.”

Zuckerberg will argue based on the opening speech he prepared that although Article 230 needs to be changed, excessive actions may result in the company’s stricter restrictions on content posted on the platform, which may lead them into legal disputes.

Zuckerberg will explain: “If there is no section 230, the platform may be responsible for everything people say.”

But he added that “Congress should update the law to ensure that it works as expected,” and “we are ready to work with Congress to develop regulations in these areas.”

According to his prepared opening speech, Dorsey will call for “consideration and restraint” and tell legislators that the erosion of the law “may collapse our way of communicating on the Internet, leaving only a few giants and strong funds. Technology company.”

After Biden’s exposure in The Post, Federal Communications Commission Chairman Ajit Pai stated that his agency will try to “clarify” the meaning of Section 230.

Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai, Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey and Facebook head Mark Zuckerberg
Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai, Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey and Facebook head Mark ZuckerbergGetty Images (3)

President Trump accused Twitter and Facebook of interfering in the election by censoring reports in The Post.

In an interview with Sinclair Broadcast Group, Trump said that technology companies are “struggling to protect” Hunter Biden’s father, Trump’s Democratic presidential challenger Joe Biden, but “they Being caught, this is really a big story.”

When asked if it constitutes election interference, Trump said: “Yes, 100%.”


Source link