its. Elizabeth WarrenElizabeth Warren Hill’s campaign report: Republican senator says Biden is worth holding a briefing. Biden discussed the COVID issue with Democratic leaders. (D-Mass.) Last Friday condemned the Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito In his speech at the Federalist Association’s annual meeting on Thursday, Warren called it a “naked partisan” speech.
The Democratic presidential candidate before 2020 “the Supreme Court justice should not be a political hacker” Wrote on Twitter. “This right-wing speech is a naked partisan.
“My bill #EndCorruptionNow By forcing judges to abide by the code of ethics followed by other federal judges, the integrity of our courts is restored. “Warren added. Anti-Corruption and Public Integrity Law It aims to prevent political corruption and political party relations in the judiciary.
The Supreme Court justices should not be used as a political tool. The right-wing speech is naked and partisan. My bill to #EndCorruptionNow has restored the integrity of our courts by forcing judges to comply with the ethics of other federal judges. https://t.co/VAjFAqGesN
-Elizabeth Warren (@SenWarren) November 13, 2020
Thursday in Alito Comments via video, The judge claims the coronavirus pandemic According to Reuters, this has led to “previously unimaginable” restrictions on freedom.
Alito specifically pointed out the impact of restrictions on religious activities, such as Easter Sunday and Yom Kippur.
Senator of Rhode Island Sheldon WhitehouseSheldon Whitehouse (Sheldon Whitehouse) Democrats warn Republicans will regret Barrett’s confirmation (D) also aimed at Alito, Tweet on Friday morning Justice is the “full-scale guerrilla crusade.”
Alito showed himself to be a full-scale guerrilla crusader. In the Federalist Association, quite a few. #CapturedCourts https://t.co/v1JS7dh6HT
-Sheldon Whitehouse (@SenWhitehouse) November 13, 2020
It is generally believed that it is a norm for Supreme Court justices and federal judges not to comment on political party issues. Many people believe that legal professionals have the responsibility to be fair judges of the law, rather than political advocates.
LGBT human rights groups also criticized Alito, saying in his speech on Thursday: “You cannot say that marriage is a union between a man and a woman. Until recently, this was the thinking of most Americans. Now this is considered paranoid. ”
He added: “This will happen after our decision in Oberfield, which is not surprising,” he cited the landmark 2015 Oberfield v. Hodges judgment, which The rights of gay marriage nationwide are guaranteed.
On Thursday, Alito cited his dissent in the case, in which he argued that the majority opinion would cause those who “adhere to the traditional concept of marriage” to be “labeled as die-hards and be labeled by the government, employers and schools treat.”
In response, Aphonso David, Chairman of the Human Rights Movement Arguing on Twitter That Alito”Pretending to be any impartiality in a speech full of political color, once again criticized Oberjfer’s decision. “
David added: “The righteous: our love and marriage are valid.” “There is no tension between complete equality and religious freedom.”
Last night, Justice Alito concealed the fact of impartiality in a speech full of political colors and once again criticized Oberjfer’s judgment.
Justice Alito: Our love and marriage are effective. There is no tension between complete equality and religious freedom. https://t.co/s6kZdeUOb2
-Alphonso David (@AlphonsoDavid) November 13, 2020