قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / US / Elizabeth Warren criticized Justice Alito’s “naked guerrilla” remarks

Elizabeth Warren criticized Justice Alito’s “naked guerrilla” remarks



its. Elizabeth WarrenElizabeth Warren Hill’s campaign report: Republican senator says Biden is worth holding a briefing. Biden discussed the COVID issue with Democratic leaders. (D-Mass.) Last Friday condemned the Supreme Court Justice Samuel AlitoWill the Supreme Court of Samuel Alito cancel Obama’s life support?Trump’s lawsuit favors American democracy and the Obama regime and the saddest objectionMore In his speech at the Federalist Association’s annual meeting on Thursday, Warren called it a “naked partisan” speech.

The Democratic presidential candidate before 2020 “the Supreme Court justice should not be a political hacker” Wrote on Twitter. “This right-wing speech is a naked partisan.

“My bill #EndCorruptionNow By forcing judges to abide by the code of ethics followed by other federal judges, the integrity of our courts is restored. “Warren added. Anti-Corruption and Public Integrity Law It aims to prevent political corruption and political party relations in the judiciary.

Thursday in Alito Comments via video, The judge claims the coronavirus pandemic According to Reuters, this has led to “previously unimaginable” restrictions on freedom.

Alito specifically pointed out the impact of restrictions on religious activities, such as Easter Sunday and Yom Kippur.

Senator of Rhode Island Sheldon WhitehouseSheldon Whitehouse (Sheldon Whitehouse) Democrats warn Republicans will regret Barrett’s confirmation (D) also aimed at Alito, Tweet on Friday morning Justice is the “full-scale guerrilla crusade.”

It is generally believed that it is a norm for Supreme Court justices and federal judges not to comment on political party issues. Many people believe that legal professionals have the responsibility to be fair judges of the law, rather than political advocates.

LGBT human rights groups also criticized Alito, saying in his speech on Thursday: “You cannot say that marriage is a union between a man and a woman. Until recently, this was the thinking of most Americans. Now this is considered paranoid. ”

He added: “This will happen after our decision in Oberfield, which is not surprising,” he cited the landmark 2015 Oberfield v. Hodges judgment, which The rights of gay marriage nationwide are guaranteed.

On Thursday, Alito cited his dissent in the case, in which he argued that the majority opinion would cause those who “adhere to the traditional concept of marriage” to be “labeled as die-hards and be labeled by the government, employers and schools treat.”

In response, Aphonso David, Chairman of the Human Rights Movement Arguing on Twitter That Alito”Pretending to be any impartiality in a speech full of political color, once again criticized Oberjfer’s decision. “

David added: “The righteous: our love and marriage are valid.” “There is no tension between complete equality and religious freedom.”




Source link