قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / US / Democratic Senator Tina Smith: “I will vote to get rid of stubborn hooks, ropes and sinkers” | US News

Democratic Senator Tina Smith: “I will vote to get rid of stubborn hooks, ropes and sinkers” | US News



Few federal legislators give a complete introduction to issues with major legislative consequences.

But for Minnesota Senator Tina Smith, the requirement to change one of the most critical issues facing the Biden administration (reform of the rules for the underprivileged) has become overwhelming.

She now tells the Guardian that she now believes that if reforms are not carried out, they must cause serious “damage”

; to the American democratic system without reform measures, and this is a rule by which the Senate minority can prevent legislation. .

Smith’s actions are crucial. Behind the upsurge of the Senate Democratic Caucus, they either cut their budgets drastically or completely destroyed the tools used to obstruct legislation, but the usually quieter senators like Smith finally screamed out. These senators said that they had had enough and wanted to make substantive changes to the party members-either a workaround for certain legislative proposals (such as voting rights), or a modification to make the party members. Threats from the party members will not bring Congress to a standstill.

Senator Angus King of Maine (Angus King of Maine) put his position on the opposition in a recent interview. In the same way, Smith provided his own reasons for calling for some major change to the obstructors. Smith is the former lieutenant governor of Minnesota. He came to the Senate through the appointment of then Governor Mark Dayton in 2018 and initially saw its value. That has changed.

In an interview with The Guardian, Smith pointed out that contrary to how advocates describe harassers (as a tool for minorities to listen to opinions), this gives minority legislators tremendous power.

“I often think that it is important to hear minority views in the Senate, and that people should have the opportunity to unite, overcome differences, and get things done. But that didn’t happen.” Smith said.

“Opponents do not encourage compromise. The opposition makes it easy for any member of the Senate to reject it. And the more I look at it, the more I see its damage to our democracy.”

She added: “I further realized that this is so undemocratic and that [that] All other governing bodies that I have worked with have basically operated according to the rules determined by the majority, and I have concluded that the obstructors are contributing to the downfall of the Senate. “

When Smith made the above remarks, the Republican senator’s stance on the opposition was opposite to that of the Democrats.

Republicans in the Supreme Senate believe that the Democratic Party’s move to change its legislative tools is just an attempt to seize the power of minority members. Former South Carolina Senator Jim DeMint (Jim DeMint), a conservative Republican, recently wrote his own column, demonstrating the importance of the opposition to the small state.

“The people who want to get rid of the harassers are the people the founders want to protect us from harm!” Deming wrote.

However, despite the increasing preference for what to do to obstructors, the Democrats have yet to decide exactly what to do.

Smith said: “Well, I think the decision about what we need to do and how to change the rules (if the rules need to be changed) is a decision that needs to happen in our own way. But it happens at a certain time and place. So, I came to the conclusion that I will vote to get rid of tangled hooks, ropes and sinkers.

“No one else in my core team has reached this position. If we get to the point where someone wants to say, “We should get rid of the obstacles to this problem,” I will certainly consider this. Of course I will.”

No matter what decision they make, if Democrats do drastically reform the opposition, if Republicans regain power in the Senate in mid-2022, they may be angry. By then, they will become a minority party, and they will hardly have any legislation to invest in.

When asked about this prospect, Smith stopped.

“Okay,” Smith said. “I thought about it long and hard. I thought about the issues that I cared so much that I worried that Republicans would change drastically like women’s reproductive choices, or like labor, [or] People’s right to organize. “

“But fundamentally, I believe in the core values ​​of democracy and republic…Most people need to be able to make decisions, and we need to make sure that this can be achieved.” If Republicans take steps to reduce the values, steps, and values ​​that Americans really cherish. Right, that would be a big problem for them. “


Source link