قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / Technology / CBS faces litigation over whether MacGyver is a spin-off company or a remake company

CBS faces litigation over whether MacGyver is a spin-off company or a remake company



McGyway

McGyway
photo: Mark Hill/CBS

Television studios like to confuse the terms “remake”, “restart”, “revival” and “derivative”. Many of them seem to have interchangeable definitions. However, Really, Is there any difference?The most direct explanation is probably that the remake is a new version of the old thing, and the restart is different The edition is the revival of the old thing, the revival is the continuation of the old thing, and the derivative product is the new thing related to another thing. Regardless of whether these definitions are feasible or not, CBS is now facing a lawsuit that depends in part on how people interpret these terms.

according to deadline, Two groups named Hanzer Holdings and Arlita Inc. filed a lawsuit against CBS in 2018 on the grounds that the network was new at the time McGyway, Claiming that they are the “successors” of the famous major talent agency, which is the original packaging agency McGyway series. You may remember the concept of “packaging”, The struggle between Hollywood writers and agents a few years ago, But the relevant part here is that the main talent agency apparently acquired some kind of vague third-party equity in the original authorized agency McGyway In 1984, and as part of the same transaction that produced “every series”, the two companies now stated that they had inherited the shares.

It sounds like Hanzer and Arlita’s argument is that as a “derivative” of the original series, the new McGyway Is part of the original McGyway The franchise is therefore eligible to be part of any original agreement entered into by the MTA. At the same time, CBS’ response was essentially, “This is not how it works, nor is it any working principle.” CBS said that it and Paramount ( McGyway (Rights) have ever had any kind of transaction with Hanzer Holdings, and they “never even heard of the plaintiff Arlita Inc.”. Until the lawsuit is filed, but even if the lawsuit is filed, the written content of the original transaction (as proposed by the plaintiff) “is not even applicable to the remake”, which is what CBS said is the new content. McGyway Actually.

So there are two perspectives here: Does the old paperwork explain what Hanzer and Arlita are saying? McGyway Also with new McGyway? If it comes to the second point, studios may actually have to start paying attention to what they call these projects, and we may one day stop calling every remake/restart/resurrection/stripping/anything called remake/restart /Renaissance/ Spin-off/Any form.


Source link