قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / US / Breonna Taylor case: Kentucky AG office and raids to prevent disclosure of investigation materials

Breonna Taylor case: Kentucky AG office and raids to prevent disclosure of investigation materials



At the time of the argument, the Louisville Courier-Journal intervened in the case and requested that the discovery materials be archived as part of the court’s public records. A lawyer for the document argued that the public has the right to know about the former Louisville case. Happening. Metro Police Officer Brett Hankison is being processed.

A large jury sued Hankison for allegedly shooting into a neighbor’s apartment through Taylor’s home, causing first-degree wanton harm. He pleaded not guilty to the charges.

Taylor (Taylor) is 26 years old and was shot and killed by police in her home in a vicious attack in March. The Attorney General said that two police officers opened fire on Sergeant Taylor. The use of force by Jonathan Mattingly and the famous detective Myles Cosgrove makes sense because Taylor̵

7;s boyfriend shot them first and hit Mattingly.

“In a sense, the judicial system is going on trial here, I don’t think it is an exaggeration.” Michael Abate, a lawyer representing the Courier-Journal, argued in court. “The public has the right not only to check the evidence in this case, but also to check how the Attorney General and the federal government handled this case.”
The grand jury of Breonna Taylor said the actions taken by the police on the night of her death were

Assistant Attorney General Barbara Whaley (Barbara Whaley) of the Attorney General’s Office expressed concern about Hankison. They are concerned that the material found has not been accepted as evidence. Hankison deserves the jury “as much as possible. stay neutral”.

Wally pointed out: “Almost every day, there will be a lot of information in the media. If this discovery is recorded and then publicly published, it will increase and increase the amount of publicly released information.”

Judge Ann Bailey Smith of the Jefferson County Circuit Court pointed out that the Kentucky Attorney General Daniel Cameron himself has disclosed many details of the evidence in this case-quote the press conference after the announcement of Hankison’s indictment , And reported the case several times on the office website on how to obtain information for submission to the grand jury.

The jurors are usually required to consider only the evidence admitted in the trial.

Smith said: “It has been made public. It has been made public by your office. I think it’s a bit late to go back now.”

Hankison’s lawyer, William Stewart Matthews, argued that he was worried that if the material was discovered, it would be difficult to find unbiased jurors.

Wally believes that people are worried about publishing laboratory reports and ballistic reports conducted by federal authorities.

Smith urged the Attorney General’s Office to believe that the release of these reports would affect the fairness of the jurors, adding that Cameron had publicly discussed ballistic reports in detail.

Wally pointed out: “There has been a statement, but we would like to congratulate you. Having a printed copy of it and having the opportunity to conduct research in public will make the (potential) jurors very aware of this.” “I think the jury Will not be polluted.”

Sam Aguiar, an attorney for the Taylors, told CNN that he was worried that the information might not be provided to the grand jurors in the material, and pointed out that most of the information provided to the grand jurors has been made public. release. Specifically, Aguiar said that he wanted to know whether the data collected from Hankison’s mobile phone was part of the discovery file.

Aguiar said in a statement to CNN: “I think the company knows that this will involve other officers. This is another attempt by Daniel Cameron to protect officers.”

Smith is expected to issue a ruling later. Another pre-trial hearing on the case is scheduled to be held at 10:30 am on January 20.


Source link