Industry leaders and shipowners claim that under the new EU agreement, the British fisheries sector will face immediate difficulties and long-term damage.
Angrily, the “marginal” gains from fishing shares allowed by the British quotas may be offset by the end of the “quota swap” system, which has so far enabled the deal between British ships and them. Colleagues from continental Europe.
Many fishermen, especially those on the southern coast of England, are also angry that EU ships can sail only six miles from the British coast.
Minister of the Cabinet Office, Michael Gove, said on Monday that the agreement between the UK and the European Union was the “best deal” for the entire fishery.
Gove also stated that he will announce the department’s “major funding plan” in the “very near future” to help it take full advantage of Brexit.
Gove pointed out in the Scots book that British fishermen currently have the right to catch about half of the fish in the country̵
However, the National Federation of Fishermen’s Organizations (NFFO) claimed that the benefits were negligible. After Gove made the speech, NFFO CEO Barrie Deas said that the industry is increasingly disappointed and frustrated.
He said: “There are some marginal changes in the quota share, but we are tied to an arrangement that allows EU fleets to enter our waters up to the six-mile limit. We think the exclusive 12-mile limit is absolutely true for the UK A red line. That hasn’t been held yet.”
According to NFFO, the current share of the UK in certain stocks has only increased slightly. For example, the share of Celtic Haddock has increased from 10% to 20%, and the share of North Sea saithe (coley) has increased from 23% to 20%. 26%.
Andrew Locker, the head of the family business Lockers Trawlers, who runs two fishing boats outside of Peterhead, Aberdeenshire, said that the loss of the quota exchange system has made it difficult for many people working in the North Sea Said that 2021 will face challenges.
He said: “I don’t know how we will develop by 2021.” “We used to trade quotas that we didn’t want in exchange for quotas that the French or Germans didn’t want, which allowed us to make annual fishing plans.
“This year we will have a severe shortage of Catch, Cod and Cod. I am angry, disappointed and betrayed.”
Elspeth Macdonald, chief executive of the Scottish Fishermen’s Federation, said she didn’t think the deal would deliver on promises.
She said: “The principles that the government says it supports-controlling access rights, quota shares based on zoning, and annual negotiations-don’t seem to be the core of the agreement. After all the promises to the industry, this is really disappointing.”
There are also concerns about the export of fish from the UK to the European continent. Tavish Scott, CEO of the Scottish Salmon Producers Organization, said: “Brexit means that the Scottish salmon industry is now facing more red tape, bureaucracy and paperwork, which is the reality of additional trade barriers.”
Irish fishing groups condemned the Brexit agreement as a serious setback. “This deal is really a bad fish deal for Ireland,” said Seán O’Donoghue, chief executive of the Kiribegs Fishermen Organization, the largest group in the industry one.
He claimed that these clauses looked “even worse” than the clauses that first appeared last week, when the organization issued a strong condemnation of the impact of the deal, especially the mackerel fishing.
Irish fisherman Micheál Martin met with representatives of the fisheries organization on Monday afternoon. Martin acknowledged that the outcome of the Brexit negotiations will have a serious impact on Ireland’s fisheries and said that a “comprehensive plan” will be formulated to address their concerns.