قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / US / Appeals in affirmative litigation favor Harvard’s court rules and pave the way for the Supreme Court’s challenge

Appeals in affirmative litigation favor Harvard’s court rules and pave the way for the Supreme Court’s challenge



Judge Sandra Lynch, the appointment of Bill Clinton, gave an opinion. In the oral debate in September, she also led most of the inquiries and worked with Judge Juan Torruella appointed by former President Ronald Reagan to seek racial discrimination and discrimination. Evidence, although Toruela did not participate in the ruling.

Background: The student’s fair admission appeal argued that the district court could not determine whether Harvard treated Asian American applicants fairly. It also made the university’s use of “personal ratings” in admissions decisions a focus of attention. The organization believes that Asian-American applicants have lower ratings than their peers and are discriminatory.

The Trump administration also participated in the oral debate on behalf of the SFFA, arguing that Asian-American applicants were “overwhelmed by the burden of Harvard’s widespread and widespread use of race.”

What̵

7;s next: A government-backed lawsuit may be the next opportunity for the Supreme Court to ban affirmative action. The president of the Fair Admissions Student Organization, Edward Blum, and a longtime anti-affirmative activist, vowed on Thursday to let the High Court accept the case.

Bloom said in a statement: “Although we are disappointed with the opinion of the First Circuit Court of Appeals, our hope has not been lost.” “This lawsuit is now available to the U.S. Supreme Court, and we will demand The judge ended Harvard and all colleges and universities’ unfair and unconstitutional admissions policies based on race.”

Although the High Court has repeatedly supported the use of race as a factor in college admissions, they will be replaced in a key swing ballot thanks to the confirmation of the justices of Judges Amy Kony Barrett and Brett Kavanov Anthony Kennedy, this may change under the court’s neoconservative majority. The use of race was approved in recent comments.


Source link