قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / Health / Anti-abortion faith leaders support the use of COVID-19 vaccine

Anti-abortion faith leaders support the use of COVID-19 vaccine



In the growing consensus, religious leaders at the forefront of the anti-abortion movement in the United States told their followers that acceptable primary vaccines against COVID-19 are acceptable because they are remote and indirect with derived cell lines. Contact the aborted fetus.

Robert Jeffress, the pastor of the giant Southern Baptist church, is an outspoken abortion enemy in Dallas, calling these vaccines “gifts from God.”

Jeffries said in an email: “Ask God for help and then refuse to get vaccinated. It makes more sense than calling 91

1 when the house is on fire, but refuse to let the firefighters in.” “There is no legitimate faith-based reason to refuse vaccination. “

Al Mohler, the pastor of the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, also celebrated their development.

He said on his website: “I will not only benefit my own health, but also benefit others.”

The statement said that opposing abortion is the “first priority” of the United States. Last month, the American Conference of Catholic Bishops stated that vaccination against the coronavirus should be “understood as an act of charity to other members of our community.” Chaired by the chairman of its doctrine committee and the pro-life activity committee.

The bishops said that despite the “remote connection with morally impaired cell lines,” Catholics are morally acceptable to two vaccines produced by Pfizer and Modena that are approved for use in the United States. This requires the use of fetal cell lines in laboratory tests to confirm the effectiveness of the vaccine.

The bishop said that another leading vaccine produced by AstraZeneca has suffered more moral damage. The vaccine is produced by AstraZeneca and has been used in the UK and some other countries.

Coinciding with the USCCB, the four bishops of Colorado issued their own statement Takes a more negative attitude towards AstraZeneca, calling it “morally not a valid choice.”

AstraZeneca uses a cell line called HEK293 to develop its vaccine. According to the Oxford University team that developed it, the original HEK293 cells were obtained from the kidneys of aborted fetuses in 1973, but the cells used now are clones of original cells, not original fetal tissues.

With the approval of the first vaccines last year, some Catholic bishops warned that it was morally unacceptable. Among them is Bishop Joseph Brennan of Fresno, California, who urges Catholics not to jump on the “vaccine wave.”

He later changed his position, saying that due to personal and community health risks, “Catholics may have morally decided to use such vaccines for serious reasons.”

Bishop Joseph Strickland of Tyler, Texas, also questioned the vaccine. He once described any use of aborted fetuses in vaccine development as evil and said he would not take it. Any currently available vaccine.

He said in an e-mail: “The church has said that vaccination is allowed under certain circumstances. I have no objection to this.” “The church has also said that we should vigorously call for the production of vaccines in an ethical manner. I urge those who are vaccinated. Of people join this mission and demand change.”

Strickland encourages donations to the John Paul II Institute of Medicine, which supports research aimed at the development of so-called “moral” cell lines (using adult stem cells) that will be used in the production of vaccines and other medical therapies.

Some other bishops who firmly opposed abortion also received the vaccine.

The Bishop of Providence, Rhode Island, Thomas Tobin wrote on Twitter: “When Christians interact with the world, in many cases it is impossible to completely avoid cooperating with moral evil.” It has been stated on multiple levels that it is morally acceptable to accept the vaccines currently available. I agree.”

Bishop Richard Stika of Knoxville, Tennessee, said he has no doubts about vaccination.

He joked on Twitter: “I just hope they don’t implant microchips in my arms to determine when I cheated.”

According to Reverend Russell Moore, the head of the Public Policy Department of the Southern Baptist Convention, among Protestant evangelical leaders who usually have strong anti-abortion views, anti-vaccination rhetoric is relatively rare.

He said: “I can’t think of an evangelical pastor saying,’Don’t get vaccinated.'”

The pastor said that a more significant challenge for pastors is to oppose unfounded anti-vaccine conspiracy theories accepted by certain members of their congregation or community-for example, vaccines will change recipients’ DNA or secretly implant microchips.

Globally, the Vatican has issued guidelines that are basically similar to those of the American bishop, declaring that Catholics are morally acceptable for the COVID-19 vaccine, based on research using aborted fetal cells.

One difference: it does not name or provide detailed information about a specific vaccine. The Vatican plans to use Pfizer vaccines for employees and their families starting this week. Pope Francis stated in an interview with the Italian Broadcasting Corporation broadcast this weekend that he has booked an appointment for vaccination.

The Vatican stated that it is wrong to refuse vaccination based solely on abortion objections, because refusal “may also bring risks to others”.

Molecular biologist and Catholic priest Nicanor Austriaco teaches at universities in the United States and the Philippines.

Austriaco said that “the moral sins considered here” occurred in the 1970s when the original cell line was created, “it is very far away.”

G. Kevin Donovan, a professor of pediatrics at Georgetown University who directs his Pellegrino Center for Clinical Bioethics, said that the leader of his Catholic faith could not be “more clear.”

Donovan said: “The advantage of Catholics is… the highest level of authority has clearly shown that this is a morally acceptable thing.”

In Indonesia, the country with the largest Muslim population in the world, the Muslim Religious Council has been included in the country’s vaccine procurement procedures to ensure that the product is halal or acceptable under Islamic law. In the past, the committee ruled that certain vaccines against other diseases were unacceptable because they used pork-derived gelatin.

But on Friday, the committee approved China’s Sinovac COVID-19 vaccine, paving the way for distribution in Indonesia.

___

Associated Press writer Elana Schor in Washington, Nicole Winfield in Rome and Victoria Milko in Jakarta, Indonesia contributed to this report.

___

The Associated Press’s religious report gained support from the Eli Lilly Foundation through “dialogue.” The Associated Press is solely responsible for this content.


Source link