قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / World / Another affluent community in Florida gets a special opportunity to use the COVID-19 vaccine

Another affluent community in Florida gets a special opportunity to use the COVID-19 vaccine



National Review

The Democratic Party’s New Plan to Control Political Speech

‘We humans. These words changed everything. The power lies with the people, not the government. The freedom to think, speak, act, and criticize the government is all protected. “Big talk, commendable. However, these words from the candidate Joe Biden introduce President Joe Biden’s agenda to reduce the freedom that these words have. Biden’s “Government Work Plan to Guarantee the People”

; recognizes that, The First Amendment prevented his ultimate goal “to completely eliminate private funds from our federal elections.” That is why he will push for constitutional amendments to free the rights of the people from government obstacles. During the 2020 general elections, conduct More Americans donate money to the campaign than ever before, and millions of Americans express their voices through independent groups representing them. The President wants to prohibit such citizen participation, which is protected by the First Amendment. Bye Den’s plan will ban so-called external spending, that is, speech by groups not controlled by candidates or political parties. The term tells you all the mentality behind the plan you need to know. Since when have we people outside of democracy? Obviously, This is the president’s democratic vision: a machine that maintains the status quo. Those in power enjoy a monopoly in political speeches, and the people are just spectators. Democrats in Congress have introduced legislation to get us halfway. HR 1 (Senate S.1) In response to your “external” voice, Biden wishes to remain silent. The bill also states that efforts to silence independent groups will not stop in speeches urging fellow Americans to vote for or against candidates. HR 1’s “Stop Super PAC-Candidate Coordination” regulations go far beyond Super PAC and will capture comments that are not related to elections. Any organization that discusses policy issues may trigger a comprehensive “coordination” standard. According to “HR 1” Today’s advocacy organization’s routine exchanges on legislation will be illegal. For example, a civil rights organization published an analysis report highlighting areas of criminal justice reform bills that could be improved. The initiator of the legislation proposed to the group Question. During the conversation, the senator mentioned that she plans to emphasize the bill in the upcoming election campaign. Just like this, this policy discussion triggered a ban on speech. The group is engaged in “communication”… About candidates Campaign advertisements, messages, strategies, policies, voting, resource allocation, fundraising or other campaign activities of people or committees.” As a result, the group was prohibited from spending a penny on “promoting or supporting” a senator’s speech, “whatever Does the newsletter clearly advocate elections.”. . candidate. “This vague language applies to communication at any time, not just to the upcoming election. According to Article 1 of the Bill of Rights, legislators can simply be urged to “support Senator Jane Doe’s Criminal Law Reform Act.” If the bill is awaiting a vote by the senator 120 days before the general election, the ban will apply to “alleged” communications. The senator, even if the senator is not considered to promote or support the legislator. Like Biden’s plan The text of “HR 1” pointed out that ultimately “the Constitution should be amended” to control the freedom of the First Amendment. In addition, the Democrats in the House of Representatives recently reintroduced the “National Democracy Amendment”, which will give Congress unlimited powers. Candidates and others have reasonable restrictions on raising and spending money to influence elections. “If the Biden plan shows that Democrats consider “reasonable restrictions,” then one can assume that the complete elimination of campaign donations and independent speech is on the table. Likewise, don’t expect restrictions or bans to stop in election advocacy. If After passing HR 1, Americans will certainly defend their rights in court. Supporters of the bill in Congress may hope that the First Amendment will repeal certain provisions, such as the Federal Election Act of 1971 and The same is true of the 2002 Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (ie McCain Feingold). They don’t care. They will fire the Citizens’ Union again, which is a new “threat to democracy”. Matter does not have to be bluffing-after all, Citizens United, which was judged in 2010, repealed a federal law that banned movies about Hillary Clinton, the leading candidate for democracy at the time. The Supreme Court’s ruling was against Free political speech is a gospel, and the prediction of the end of the world has not been passed. Remember, Democrats in Congress have long supported constitutional amendments that restrict the rights of the First Amendment. Biden himself co-sponsored this in 1997 The amendment. The call to “overthrow the Citizens’ Union” is nothing more than a marketing strategy. Too many elected officials believe that the people’s right of speech in a democratic system should begin and end on the day you vote. Maybe that’s why they always It’s to make sure you know why they intend to make voting “easier and less difficult.” It seems to be saying, “This is your democracy, shut up now. “


Source link