قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / Business / Amazon responds to Parler lawsuit, citing violent content, Article 230

Amazon responds to Parler lawsuit, citing violent content, Article 230



  • Amazon responded to a lawsuit filed by Parler on Tuesday, accusing the tech giant of violating antitrust laws by banning the use of Amazon Web Services on controversial social media platforms.
  • Amazon claimed in its response that Parler refused to delete more than 100 instances of violent content, including death threats to prominent Democrats, Republican technology executives and Black Lives Matter supporters, thus violating the contract.
  • Amazon also cited Section 230 as part of its defense against Parler, which claimed that Amazon and Twitter conspired to harm Parler’s business by exiting AWS.
  • Major technology companies including Apple and Google severed ties with Parler this week. It is reported that far-right insurgents have used social media platforms to organize and incite violence in the U.S. Capitol.
  • Visit Business Insider̵
    7;s homepage for more stories.

Amazon responded to an antitrust lawsuit filed by Parler on Tuesday, saying that social media upstarts’ refusal to remove violent content from its platform violated its contract and that Parler failed to prove any antitrust claims.

After the tech giant launched its platform from its web hosting service Amazon Web Services, Paller sued Amazon on Monday, and the public strongly protested Paller’s role in enabling far-right insurgents to organize and plan an attack on the U.S. Capitol last week.

Amazon claimed in court documents: “This case is not about suppressing speech or stifling opinions. This is not a conspiracy to restrict trade.” “On the contrary, this case is about Paller’s unwillingness and powerlessness… threatening public safety. Content, such as inciting and planning rape, torture and assassination of designated public officials and private citizens.”

Parler did not comment on the news.

Amazon cited more than a dozen examples of content posted to Parler, saying it violated Amazon’s policies.

The document said: “We will fight in the civil war on January 20. Now we will form MILITIAS and get the goal.” Another article said: “White people need to ignite their ethnic identity and reduce suffering, like a hurricane. death.”

Other articles published by Parler include death threats to prominent Democrats, such as former President Barack Obama, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer ( Chuck Schumer and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, as well as Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos (Jeff Bezos), Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey ( Jack Dorsey), Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg (Mark Zuckerberg) and Google parent company Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai.

Parler’s users also target people of color, Black Lives Matter activists, Jews, teachers, the media, and professional sports leagues including the NBA, NFL, MLB and NHL.

read more: Parler was forced to go offline because he could not mitigate the threat. The screenshots show what content the Capitol riot supporters posted before, during and after the unrest.

Amazon stated: “There is no legal basis in the AWS customer agreement, otherwise AWS cannot be forced to host content of this nature.” It added that it had “repeatedly” notified Parler of content companies that violated the terms of the two in mid-November 2020. But Parler “neither willing nor able” to cancel the contract.

Amazon also deliberately favored the use of AWS’s Twitter to oppose Parler’s claim that Parler’s behavior was politically motivated and violated antitrust laws and did not take similar actions.

Amazon said in the document: “AWS does not host Twitter feeds, so of course it cannot suspend access to Twitter content.” He pointed out that Twitter ultimately blocked violent content, and Parler refused to take similar steps.

Amazon also cited Article 230 of the Communications Standards Act, which gives companies operating “interactive computer services” the legal right to delete content they deem appropriate.

read more: In the rapid and mysterious rise of Parler, the “free speech” Twitter alternative created a platform for conservatives by burning Silicon Valley scripts

Due to increasing pressure on mainstream social media sites to suppress hate speech, disinformation and violent appeals, Parler has become pivotal in recent months.

After the US presidential election in November, Trump supporters flocked to other social networks, including Parler, to plan election protests after Facebook and other websites banned groups that incite unprovoked conspiracies. According to Apptopia data, from November 3 to November 9, Parler has been downloaded approximately 530,000 times in the United States.

Pro-Trump mobs violently occupied the U.S. Capitol in an attack on Wednesday, killing five people. Armed mobs used Parler and other conservative social media apps to organize. Apptopia told Business Insider that since October, Parler’s downloads have soared to 323% of the average weekly downloads.

However, as details about how the insurgents used Parler to carry out last week’s attacks came to light, large technology companies are under pressure to cut relationships. Both Apple and Google withdrew the app from their app stores earlier this week, and Parler was forced to migrate its web hosting to Epik (Epik) after being guided from AWS.


loading
Some content is loading.


Source link