Another social media site this week suspended Amazon Web Services (Amazon Web Services) and filed a lawsuit against the corporate giant. Amazon fought back against Parler on Tuesday.
After a fatal riot in the U.S. Capitol last week and Amazon Web Services cut off the upstart platform from its cloud hosting service, Parler entered the third day of offline.
In response to Paller’s lawsuit, Amazon Web Services said: “This case is not about suppressing speech or stifling opinions. This is not a conspiracy to restrict trade.” “On the contrary, this case is about Parler’s unwillingness. And it is impossible to delete content that threatens public safety from Amazon Web Services (̵
|Amazon||AMAZON.COM INC.||3,120.83||+6.62||+ 0.21%|
Amazon Web Services said it has repeatedly told Paller that the content on the site violated the agreement between the two companies. The suspension is a “last resort” to prevent access to violent content, AWS said, “including violent plans to disrupt the upcoming presidential transition.”
Read Amazon’s response
The response read: “There is no legal basis in the AWS customer agreement, otherwise AWS cannot be forced to host content of this nature.”
Parler is seeking a temporary restraining order to prevent Amazon Web Services from being dragged down by Parler. It claimed that AWS violated the Sherman Antitrust Act in the document and pointed out that AWS had reached an agreement with competitor Twitter.
AWS argued in the document that the temporary restraining order would limit its ability to respond to websites with violent content.
EPIK stated that it has not yet discussed how to reserve equivalent domain names
After the pro-Trump riots in the U.S. Capitol, Google and Apple also took action against Peller. Google suspended Parler’s operations in its app store on Friday because the company failed to review “excessive content” posted by users related to the violent siege last week.
AWS said that after the “#hangmikepence” hashtag appears on Twitter, it will not host Twitter feeds and “cannot suspend access to Twitter content.”
Parler also accused Amazon Web Services of breaching the contract, and Amazon immediately withdrew the accusation.
Click here to start FOX business anytime
Amazon Web Services said: “Despite Paller’s rhetoric, its lawsuit is nothing more than an unreasonable claim for breach of contract. But the fact is clear: if there is any breach of contract, it is Paller’s failure and inability to identify and The ability to delete such content.” in response.
Click here to read more about FOX business
Talia Kaplan, Audrey Conklin, James Leggate and Brittany De Lea of FOX Business contributed to this report.